The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > White Ribbon Day

White Ribbon Day

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 23
  7. 24
  8. 25
  9. Page 26
  10. 27
  11. 28
  12. 29
  13. All
a 'reduce disease day' would have no effect in reducing AIDS or breast cancer because these
diseases require targeted strategies to achieve reduction not a sole fix all strategy.
failure to target a strategy is a failure to deliver the message.
similarly, a 'reduce violence day' would have no effect in reducing violence perpetrated by a boss or
an employee because these forms of violence require targeted strategies to achieve reduction not a
sole fix all strategy.
failure to target a kind of violence is a failure to deliver a remedy.
a boss who advocates a 'reduce violence day' is shirking responsibility for violent behaviour by co-
blaming employees when employee violence is a difference kind of violence.
would you support a shirker or a person prepared to take responsibility for their behaviour?
a male in Australia who purports that women are not in a subordinate relationship with men is
committing a treason against the rule of law.
Posted by whistler, Thursday, 3 December 2009 9:13:14 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
<a male in Australia who purports that women are not in a subordinate relationship with men is committing a treason against the rule of law.>
What can one say?
You've obviously had some negative experiences in your life to bring you to this point.
Please seek help.
You sound really unhappy.
Posted by HermanYutic, Thursday, 3 December 2009 9:31:45 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Whistler thanks for the link. Good one.

R0bert, well that summation was inaccurate. CJ said long ago in the thread that if there was another campaign he's support it. I haven't said anything at all that supports violence towards anyone.

Just look back at the few pages: Antiseptic's usual nasty, belittling tone especially towards CJ and repeated untruths about WRB and Dr. Michael Flood; R0bert's shameless untruth; then HermanYutic inferring that Whistler is unbalanced in some way just for pointing out the truth about where formal power resides.

- and you people purport to say that your agenda (whatever it may be) is to stop violence against everyone ?

Where is the evidence of any of you able to contain your own behaviour and direct it in a constructive way. I wouldn't feel that my well-being was a matter of concern to any of you; why should anyone have confidence that any of you know how to be non-violent?
Posted by Pynchme, Thursday, 3 December 2009 10:02:31 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
ignorance of the law is not a defence.
Australia's Constitution provides for men's legislatures only.
men boss over women in Australia, that's the law.
if you don't like patriarchy and can't handle its accompanying
responsibilities seek to provide a women's legislature.
but this constant whinging ...
Posted by whistler, Thursday, 3 December 2009 10:12:02 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Well the nature of the beast is that men who make out women to be victims are seeking to exert their power and dominance. Instill fear into women as they do, they have ready made weakened gender. Run around making victims out of everyone, except the westernised male, then the westernised male will remain dominant and in control.

That is exactly why some seem to support one agenda that appears at odds with the others they support.

It is why westernised men can never join the victim class as then they would lose their dominance. So no need to over analyse. If you are not a westernised, preferable white male, then you are a victim and you should live in fear of being oppressed, suppressed as everyone is bigoted, racist, misogynist, peodophile, xenophobic, redneck, out to get you.

If you are a white male or westernised male and have suffered abuse, get over it, the control freaks do not want to admit victim status in their own group as it will weaken them. They will instead make you out to be the perpetrators. Perpetrator status still better than pathetic victim status, is much better macho image.

The politics of fear work a treat. The westernised, primarily white male, works it like a fine art all the while making out to be Tarzan.

Noel Pearson knows it and is why he is against the victim industry surrounding Indigenous Australians. He gets it. It hands power to the very people who should have no right to it.

So women be scared little girls if you wish, but it will attract the very wrong sort of male into your universe. I guarantee it.
Posted by TheMissus, Thursday, 3 December 2009 1:49:55 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
CJ Morgan "Being 182cm and over 100kg, I'm neither little nor afraid of men."

At 100kg you are the Michelin Man and morbidly obese. Very nearly 16 Stones! Take it easy with that breathless indignation.

Sheez, that could explain your relentless attention seeking.
Posted by Cornflower, Thursday, 3 December 2009 2:56:42 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 23
  7. 24
  8. 25
  9. Page 26
  10. 27
  11. 28
  12. 29
  13. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy