The Forum > General Discussion > A challenge for pro-abortionists.
A challenge for pro-abortionists.
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
--Continuation of the pregnancy constitutes a risk to the mother; or
--The child is likely to be born with a congenital disease such as haemophilia, spina bifida or Tay-Sachs
In other words I am considering the case of a healthy foetus in a healthy mother where the most likely outcome of continuing the pregnancy is a healthy child born to a healthy mother.
Question:
How late into pregnancy should "birth control abortion" be permitted?
Defend your answer SCIENTIFICALLY – ie no recourse to religious texts.
Note, I am not asking what the law says but what you believe the law OUGHT to say - and why.
How would you modify your answer if you learned that the reason for the abortion was that the couple wanted a child of a different sex?