The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > If you want something to feel indignant about!

If you want something to feel indignant about!

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
thanks for reminding me what im indignant about
#

im indignant to the point of upset
about children are sold the santa/satan clause
on the say mans savious was born..

taught hallow-ween
taught about a bunny on the day the chist died

im peeved how evolutionists claim species[micro/evolution..of species

is claimed deceptivly to prove evolution of genus[ie change of genus]

but im so upset im not making sense

so i have put the issue before the common courts[de jure]

court de jure in session

theory/of evolution on trial..
live web ..court/de jure

this notice
notices the notice ...of de jure hearing ..on the censure of evolution

athiesm based on claimed science..of not god..or of evolution of species
not genus..and calling for jurors..

[ratio 24 clear sepperation... as measure of judgment..
.as better explained at post topic

heed and take notice that

court is in session
conducting first reading
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=120&t=3225&p=19776#p19776

this is 2 de of four notices
first is
http://forum.onlineopinion.com.au/thread.asp?discussion=3124&page=0
2 de is de jure trial
3rd is here
http://forum.worldfreemansociety.org/viewtopic.php?f=82&t=3229
4th at...PUBLIC ..open forum
http://www.peacetakescourage.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=11077&p=82369#p82369

posting in progress

please note this site shall hold the public record
as other sites are currently...closed..but im hoping we can open them up a bit

so get involved
im taking evolution down..in court...infront of a jury of my athiest/thiest peers
recall here is where i gathered all mine opponants
come to the hearing...inform the trial
or catch up here...as i recall to post the public record
Posted by one under god, Monday, 9 November 2009 12:08:08 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
thank you seano..i have calmed down a bit
im saddend people dismiss the dangers so unthinkingly

there really are people running things...treating us like cattle

that tattoo you mentioned...mate the chip is in the vacine
each chip programed with some killer apps...even govt dare not talk about[thanks to that human genome program...and computerised records

they installed different batches to do different things
so you as leader can program your serfes..to get sick..or die...at thier command...smart or dumb...via the chip's...in the juice
Posted by one under god, Monday, 9 November 2009 12:14:42 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
There are reports that Whooping Cough is flaring up again in Australia. This is a serious disease and without treatment can be fatal. It is fortunate for those who are too lazy or too ignorant to ensure their children's vaccination schedule is kept up to date that the conscientiousness of others usually keeps whooping cough and other terrible diseases at bay through maintaining pools of non-carriers of the disease/s.

Flu vaccination is usually advised for those more at risk, however in the case of swine flu, which could easily become more virulent, governments are keen to increase the resistance of most of the population. Where is the conceivable advantage in not protecting anyone? Why would government heath authorities waste their much needed resources if there was no need and no threat?
Posted by Cornflower, Monday, 9 November 2009 1:30:10 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
1. Where is the conceivable advantage in not protecting anyone?
2. Why would government heath authorities waste their much needed resources if there was no need and no threat?
(Posted by Cornflower)

1. The advantage in not protecting a chosen few is that the 'flu virus wants to survive just as much as any other life-form, and the harder it gets pushed, the harder it pushes back, and it pushes back at the innocent normal people who understand this natural action-reaction mechanism or live in third-world countries that can't afford to pay the ransom. That is why it is an extremely selfish sort of thing to impose on the rest of the world.

One example might be the deadly epidemic wrought upon late-19th century Samoa by the European 'flu. I can't find a reference to it in wiki but it was well-documented in a fiction book of all things, The Mango's Kiss, by Albert Wendt. That is why I'd never betray my species with a convenient little jab like that, even if it was offered me.

2. Because it's good business for the pharmaceutical companies.
Posted by Seano, Monday, 9 November 2009 1:48:42 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy