The Forum > General Discussion > A wink and a red suit
A wink and a red suit
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
http://www.smh.com.au/national/blinking-hazzard-makes-keneally-see-red-20091021-h92u.html
First we have Kristina Keneally using supposed sexism as a red herring to get her out of trouble, then the line from the journalist, perfectly placed, 'Keneally arrived late for question time, looking immaculate as usual in a red suit.'
Now, is it just me or was that devilishly witty? Straight after reporting the accusations of sexism, putting in a line describing the woman's outfit.
But on the other hand, it's also terribly unfair, and akin to the old boys ganging up with a bit of sexist bullying.
Now I must confess I cant stand the woman, but it's likely because of the American accent and my opinions on developer lobbying.
So what is the point. Well, is it fair play for a woman to use the sexist card to get her out of trouble, given that she's probably faced a lot of sexism in getting where she is? But if that is fair, is it fair for the male pollies to fight fire with fire because she's given the sexism card a show?
I suppose it kind of parallels celebrities selling their wedding ceremonies to the highest bidder, then complaining about when their privacy is breached.
Is she doing women a disservice? Using these accusations for nefarious purposes surely must weaken any attempts to rid parliament of sexism. Or is it an example of politics being an anything goes sport, and calls for it to be 'cleaned up' for women disingenuous and sexist in itself, as women hold their own and give as good as they take?