The Forum > General Discussion > Does the US President Barack Obama deserve the Nobel Peace Prize?
Does the US President Barack Obama deserve the Nobel Peace Prize?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- ...
- 8
- 9
- 10
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Committee told reporters:
"We are not awarding the prize for what may happen in
the future but for what he (Obama) has done in the
previous year. We would hope this will enhance what he
is trying to do."
Peace is an ongoing process. Few would argue that Martin
Luther King or the Dalai Lama did not deserve
the Nobel Peace Prize simply because permanent peace was
not accomplished.
The prize is given because of efforts
not achievements. War and peace, are not either/or
alternatives, for the various actions or inactions of the
superpowers tend to move the world one way or another
along the continuum between military holocaust and peaceful
harmony. Therefore steps designed to enhance the prospects
for peace rather than war are matters of practical reality,
not impractical ideals.
Omama encourages peaceful solutions. He seeks reductions
in nuclear arsenals and wants to restart talks between Israel
and Palestine. As the Nobel Committee said:
"His extraordinary efforts to strengthen international
diplomacy and co-operation between peoples..." is the reason
they gave him the award.
Unless we are willing to give up
the possibility of gaining further advantages over each
other in military technology, and unless we begin to trust
one another sufficiently to enter into any agreements at all,
unless we talk to each other, we risk the murder of hundreds
of millions of people, and the jeopardizing of our very
species.
A leader who reaches out to the world and asks for
co-operation - surely deserves recognition for his efforts?