The Forum > General Discussion > Should Einstein be TIME's Man of the Second Millennium
Should Einstein be TIME's Man of the Second Millennium
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Some pundits argued that TIME got it wrong. Hitler, they argued, had a greater influence on the history of the 20th Century than Einstein.
On balance I think TIME got it right. Here's why.
Think back to those two 17th Century figures, Oliver Cromwell and Isaac Newton. Outside the English speaking world few have heard of Cromwell; but every educated person knows about Isaac Newton. Similarly, I think Einstein's contribution to science will be remembered long after Hitler has been relegated to the status of obscure European warlord of interest only to a few historians.
But who deserves the title "Person of the Second Millennium"? Who, between AD 1000 and AD 2000 had the greatest impact on history?
Does Einstein get that title as well?
My vote goes to Charles Darwin though some would argue he should share the honour with Alfred Russell Wallace*. In 1859 the Theory of Evolution through NATURAL SELECTION was a BRILLIANT leap of scientific imagination.
In its early days the theory faced many obstacles. No one could imagine what sort of fuel could keep the sun burning for the hundreds of millions of years needed for evolution to work its magic. The actual mechanism of inheritance was unknown. Even the supposed age of the Earth – 400 million years at the outside said Lord Kelvin, one of the foremost scientists of his time – presented a problem. In reality, back in 1859, Darwinian evolution was not so much a "theory" as an "hypothesis".
But, in the end, Darwin's theory triumphed and the world has never been the same. The publication of "On the Origin of the Species" heralded a true discontinuity in human history.
As runners up I nominate Galileo Galilei and Isaac Newton.
Do other posters have any thoughts?
*See http://www.wku.edu/~smithch/index1.ht