Agreed Pied Piper.

You've all outdone yourselves.

Geeze man it's not even entertaining to me!

I did think Seeker was on to something though.

Antiwomen quote: "Hey people, look at "me", I've got a conspiracy theory about the NRL and Channel 9 management. Look at "me"

OLO members reply: We don't see a conspiracy there. Show us the evidence.

Antiwomen then replies " Evidence? - - - here it is, you're a pomeranian, you're a sock puppet, look at "me". If you question me it's fatuous and irrelevant, if you bring me to account you're 'obsessed'. Look at "me". She's sweeping her skirt for the pomeranian to hide behind. Tell me again how I don't admire women. Look at "me". Boy I've really shown the forum how clever I am now, and they'll all think I'm ever so smart. Look at "me" . There you go - - - that proves I am right. Look at "me" ".

OLO members then reply " The time is now 4.05AM, and this piece of info. is the most intelligent post in this topic in a long time ", and, " Gezz man, antiwomen's now juvenile posts are not even entertaining to me" , and " still Antiwomen is getting attention, and with him being one of life's losers, any attention is better than none".

To which Antiwomen will reply in his next, upcoming posts , "LOOK AT 'ME', LOOK AT 'ME', LOOK AT 'ME' ".

Yep. But it works, doesn't it?

Romany:"Yep. But it works, doesn't it?"

If you mean there are lots of people obsessed with antiseptic, then I suppose it does. The fact is, that I'd just as soon the poor feeble-minded buggers would just let a conversation take its course, instead of diverting it into a discussion of what a terrible person antiseptic is because he doesn't much like feminism and isn't afraid to say so. Oh yeah, there was a failed marriage, so that means he hates women and he mentioned violence perpetrated by women so that means his wife must have "smacked him around" (heehee).

I try to respond with good humour and to answer the odd worthwhile poster seriously, but the constant barrage of witless sock-puppets and others is trying, I must say. This latest version complains I have no "FACTS" screamed loudly and then immediately starts with the "antiwomen" garbage and the rest of the hoo ha designed to remove any possibility of discussion. Tell me, Romany, do you reckon that sort of crap deserves anything other than ridicule?

As long as the sensible posters give the sock-puppet oxgen, she'll continue to post her obsessive rants about antiseptic.

Sheesh, there’s a lot of projection going on here. If I’m not mistaken, Antiseptic and I coined the term look-at-me-feminism a few threads back. It’s a bit juvenile now to project that “look at me” characteristic back on him, isn’t it? You know who you are.

Nothing wrong with Antiseptic - he’s just helping remove a few blinkers, and I personally hope he remains strong enough to continue doing so. If you read carefully (I’m being a little more diplomatic here then Anti may have described your unwillingness to comprehend), you will realise that he is more a pro-equity-feminist than most of us put together.

I’m in the middle of rescuing my young adult feminist daughter right now. My son in a similar situation would most likely have earned a lesser response from me. I love them both, and both have had the same opportunities, but I keep asking myself why I need to be more protective and supportive of her. It puzzles me to no end, because in every respect other than gender, they are equals. Why do they not act so? Is feminism, hindering or helping - discuss.

Sadly, I don’t think the girls will take over football administration, just as they haven’t taken over anything else much. I wish they would, because then there would be less justification for hijacking the family unit, or public funds. Even Grimshaw would need another angle.

“I’m in the middle of rescuing my young adult feminist daughter right now. My son in a similar situation would most likely have earned a lesser response from me. I love them both, and both have had the same opportunities, but I keep asking myself why I need to be more protective and supportive of her. It puzzles me to no end, because in every respect other than gender, they are equals. Why do they not act so? Is feminism, hindering or helping - discuss.”

Same here Seeker, I see my daughter as requiring additional protection. You ask as if surprised by this outcome, you know the answer. Of course you need to be more supportive of her, she is weaker. Feminism points out continuously by its very existence how much weaker females are or it would not be required, wanted, requested, supported, and embraced by those in need of it.

My son I know to be a more sensitive, kinder person, my daughter a take no crap hard arse. My son feels the power a young white male has in society, my daughter does not have society backing her only her own sense of self worth and self gifted empowerment. It is not enough in a community to know your own worth it is only adequate to feel the worth others have in you.

Feminism is hindering, it points out a personal lack in all females. They can shout from the rooftops they are equal. They are mistaken for now.

Anti what did I say? Why can’t you listen? It was good advice over in the Jackson thread, did you read it?

What Romany said lead you back in to proving her point but she obviously can predict human nature well or at least she knew how predictable you were? I am so ashamed! Then you ask her a loaded question, you fool, she is going to vaporize you and if she doesn’t someone else will like CJ.

There was always a reason I liked them both so much.[smile]