The Forum > General Discussion > FREEDOM OF SPEECH
FREEDOM OF SPEECH
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
On one hand he wants to be taken seriously and engaged on an intellectual level.
While admitting not being educated in areas yet he chooses to discuss.
Education takes one so far but research and objectivity does the rest.
Sadly his comments are overwhelmed by overly simplistic, tired old OTT sloganeering. This potentially displays a lack of understanding of the realities.
It is one thing to voice an unsubstantiated opinion but to be taken seriously that opinion must display at least some understanding of the complexities involve if to avoid being dismissed as irrelevant.
When some one who obviously has a better understanding of the topic offers some missing insight it is treated as a threat. Then reverts back to the tired old tactic "if you're out of your depth obfuscate with senseless attacks" rather than admit perhaps ignorance or fault.
His apparent definitions of democracy and 'right to freedom of speech are devoid of any societal context. Perhaps he should read a little wider and deeper than the daily Murdoch and the like.
The reality of life in a 'democratic' society has a different meaning to the esoteric notion of democracy.
" If the solution is really simple it would have been done already "