CJMorgan:'Antiwomen', 'misogyny', 'only type of person that Anti hates more than women is men who don't','whining about women and crying into your beer'.

Me, a couple of posts ago: "It doesn't matter what I or Yabby might say, we'll be characterised sooner or later, fairly or unfairly, by one of the women posters as "aggressive", "misogynist", "bullying" (especially if we ask questions), or some other of the thousands of epithets that women use to mean "I feel uncomfortable and it's YOUR fault"."

Down now, there's good little fella. I'm sure that the girls don't need their crotches sniffed quite so vigorously and I'm sure they don't want your fleas.

Forrest

My 'ring' finger is longer than my index finger (both hands) - make whatever you want of that fact.

I haven't paid attention to the time of posting of anyone's posts - so will take your word for whatever it is you want to imply.

CJ

A-septics raison d'etre is to try to goad someone into replying in kind to his insulting, bitchy, condescending and patronising posts. He has admitted it himself:

"It doesn't matter what I or Yabby might say, we'll be characterised sooner or later, FAIRLY (my capitals) or unfairly, by one of the women posters as "aggressive", "misogynist", "bullying" (especially if we ask questions), or some other of the thousands of epithets that women use to mean "I feel uncomfortable and it's YOUR fault"

A-septic - you're gonna be waiting a long time, so don't hold your breath. People the calibre of Foxy et al, do not fall for your little games. Besides you do such an excellent job of 'outing' yourselves.

Ciao

Ah, that is very sweet of you Foxy, how you rush to
the defence of one of your OLO sisters.

Sadly however, psychology is not one of your strong
points lol.

Fractelle has no hesitation in dishing it out and
is not some delicate little petal, so she can clearly
handle it, when somebody, even if male, gives it back.

Fractelle,

Fair's fair. My ring finger is longer than my index finger on each hand. The length ratio in the terms imposed by the test was 0.94 in relation to each hand. The respective finger lengths were the same on each hand. I have forgotten what this is supposed to be indicative of, other than that I have not worked in a sawmill at any time during my life. (Joke: How does a sawmiller order four beers? Answer: He holds up his index finger and little finger together while keeping his thumb on the palm of his hand. Think about it. It comes across better as a demonstration.)

You said:

"I haven't paid attention to the time of posting of anyone's posts - so will take your word for whatever it is you want to imply."

Thank you for the compliment. The opacity of my posts must be improving. Bronwyn will be pleased. I thought I was indicating straight out that by showing familiarity with the content of the test given in your link that I must have already taken the test, at a time when you noted that I had 'declined' to do so. Speaking of Bronwyn, where is she? This has been a good biffo thread. Its not often we unregenerate blokes get the chance to bash Fractelle from a position of slight numerical superiority, is it?

Foxy,

Many times during the progress of this thread I have thought of your 'Lester Moore' post of many moons ago. I don't know whether it supports or undermines Fractelle's argument with respect to any dominance achieved by the 'male gaze'. Your 'montage' post in this thread indicates to me you have a thorough comprehension of the inherent simplicity of the male perspective. Onya. Lucky him!

Oh, the test results. Inconclusive, so far as I'm concerned. I'm putting most of it down to poor mouse skills. That's as much as I'll say.

Now for heaven's sake somebody insult somebody to help get Fractelle's topic over the ton!

A fun thread.

Righto, my turn with the finger thing and so on. My right was 0.96 and my left was 1.02. IOW, my left index finger is longer than my ring finger and my right is vice versa.

I'm apparently "right-brained", have low empathy and very high systemisation. I did well on the angles, scattered objects and all the other visual tests. Overall, it apparently came out as +50.

BTW, Forrest, I AM a sawmiller and I've still got all 10.

CJ Morgan:"yapayapyapyap"

Oh dear, that Pomeranian's all excited again.
Posted by Antiseptic, Saturday, 2 May 2009 7:49:59 AM

For God's sake man, GROW UP!

You are SO hypersensitive over these issues, did you have a dominant mother of something?

It's all so ironic, because you behave like an utter girlie man, you really do.

Yabbs; you make reference to Foxy 'rushing to defend..'. Have you noted septic's reference to 'Yabby and me'? Is that different?
________________________

Fractelle, now I'll answer your first post.

YES! men are more visual-hence more girlie magazines.
YES! women are more emotional-hence less male-pose magazines.
NO! not ALL in each case; but generally.

Feminist diatribe was mentioned elsewhere. What is it called when a thread about gender focused magazines result in an ongoing attack about bloody feminism? Insecure men diatribe?

What the hell else do you call it?
Any bloke that is secure in his relationship and his stature, would not be on this thread making a dogs bollocks of himself!!

(And of course to suggest that is more feminist diatribe. GET A LIFE YOU WEAK INSECURE LITTLE WALLY'S).