Col Rouge:"The objective is to find the best individual to fill any role, regardless of gender."

Absolutely correct. The preferment of individuals based on gender or some other irrelevancy is counter-productive and regressive, leading to poor outcomes and expensive failures for both the unqualified individuals and the organisations they are appointed to.

It's a shame that 40-odd years of feminism has managed to produce so many whingers with a sense of entitlement matched with a lack of ability and so few genuine achievers.

the provision of women's legislatures overcomes the scramble to ascertain as to which men are qualified as women, Antiseptic.

Well there we have it Whistler. Absolutaly no support for your
crazy ideas. Best you pick up your dummy and move to Iceland :)

Absent any argument of substance to the contrary, an Australian solution, with provision for women's legislatures, remains the more equitable option for sustanable economic management over the Icelandic solution's appointment of a female Prime Minister and female heads of banks.

whistler:"the provision of women's legislatures overcomes the scramble to ascertain as to which men are qualified as women, Antiseptic."

erm... perhaps English is your second language, but try as I might, I can't make any sense of that statement at all.

Sadly, you seem a classic example of the whinger with a sense of entitlement that I referred to above.

There have been plenty of arguments of substance presented Whistler,
but I think they are sailing clean over your head.

You seem to be against men discriminating against women, based
on gender, but you think that women should discrimate against
men, based on gender. Hehe, with that kind of rational thinking,
Iceland is still your best option!