Calls for a new world order to regulate capitalism coincide with the realisation, that after a century of male supervision, women have become competent and qualified to govern at all levels in their own right.

This achievement enables decision-making in the form of a consensus between women's and men's perspectives.

With the prospect of a republic, Australia has the opportunity to lead the new world order with governance comprising women's and men's legislatures presided over by an executive of elders accompanied by courts of women's and men's jurisdiction.

Capitalism would be regulated with the most efficient and effective utilisation of human resources available.

hmmm ...

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's calls for a new world order to regulate capitalism comes as women become competent to govern in their own right.

Decision-making by consensus is enabled.

Australians should contribute to a new world order with a Republic comprising women's and men's legislatures presided over by elders accompanied by courts of women's and men's jurisdiction.

Capitalism can be regulated easily with the optimum of human resources.

close, but no cigar ...

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's call for a new world order to regulate capitalism comes as women become competent to govern in their own right.

Decision-making by consensus is enabled.

Australians should contribute to a new world order with a Republic comprising women's and men's legislatures presided over by elders accompanied by courts of women's and men's jurisdiction.

Capitalism can be regulated easily with the optimum of human resources.

Is this the world Govt that the Bush dynasty has been pushing for decades?This smacks of 1984 with regulation coming out of every orifice.The central banks of the world along with the UN are pushing this idea and it will not be a democracy.

excellent analysis.
thank you for your contribution. :)

I read the article too… sounds like Krudd has abandoned Mee-Too now he has been elected and is showing his real Keynesian colours.

Of course the finance, banking and corporate sectors have been regulated for years… or were those companies acts and tax acts I was required to read and understand really all swiss-cheese and Sarbanes-Oxley shows how the regulations can be changed, when there is the will.

And what he is suggesting…. Is what brought UK economy to the brink of collapse back in the early 1970’s.

Re” the most efficient and effective utilisation of human resources available.”

Stalin did that,

except the “human resources" did not appreciate his definition of their “efficient and effective utilisation".

As for “Decision-making by consensus is enabled.”

As Margaret Thatcher, a lady with some success in matters of national policy, said

“To me, consensus seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects.”

Arjay “The central banks of the world along with the UN are pushing this idea and it will not be a democracy.”

That is the overriding danger.

And it being echoed in the sentiments of a government who feels entitled to censor the internet.