The Forum > General Discussion > A Conundrum of moral responsibility ?
A Conundrum of moral responsibility ?
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
- 3
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Houses are becoming bigger ( I was raised in an 11 square home to day the average is 20+) crammed with stuff.
Blocks are becoming smaller partly because the house size is more important than backyard.
We now demand the public purse to compensate for our selfishness with more parks and facilities etc. Yet we whinge about our rates.
They appear to becoming less safe "Brisbane's recent bikeway rapists" and the spate of rapes in the past in Melb parks.
Activities are more internal than external i.e. sedentary electronic rather than active external. (backyard cricket). Space for children to play whereby we can control access.
Consequently we have become more insular/isolated (many don’t know their neighbours). This has lead to a reduction of community and community responsibility.
THE CONUNDRUM
If you see someone breaking the law do you report them as a matter of public responsibility ? Does it depend on:
• Who they are?
• If it directly affect you?
• How seriously you view the breach?
Or “do you mind your own business?”
Comment.