The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Man convicted for possessing child pornography

Man convicted for possessing child pornography

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All
To the Supreme Court of New South Wales:

EAT MY SHORTS!
Posted by Fractelle, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 10:53:33 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Examinator,

I will be writing to the Attorney General, as I'm sure people like Gibo have already done. (He appears to be the only one so far to agree with the prosecution).

It's time to get rid of these stupid laws.

Gibo, these laws could be used to outlaw the Bible, so please think very carefully what you may be saying about this.

I don't think Dennis Ferguson would be turned on by the Simpsons.
Posted by Steel Mann, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 12:07:40 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
” I always thought the justification for censoring child pornography was that children were harmed in producing it"

The same weirdness is going on with ISP filtering. Some are trying to create the impression that it's about protecting children, but the filters won't stop people from abusing kids.

All this sort of rubbish does is distract our attention from where it should properly be - catching and punishing the real abusers. I wonder how many real kids were brutalised during the course of that ridiculous court proceeding? I wonder how many powerful people in high places, say, judges, are personally involved in child abuse right now?

Why are we wasting resources this way?
Posted by chainsmoker, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 12:26:20 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
If the Bible got outlawed Steel Mann it would just go underground. The Word has a roaring fire that no man could ever put out.
No one ever has!
In times of persecutions... thousands pour into Christs Kingdom.

Lets keep porn and kiddie porn under the tightest of restrictions.

When we approve of the porn and the kiddie porn EVEN for the sake of freedoms we are not better than the offender.

He does the act...we sit back and say "Onya mate" as we strive to keep the governments from controlling it, to control the offenders.

On the spiritual plane...its all the same to God.
Posted by Gibo, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 12:34:44 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Gibo “When we approve of the porn and the kiddie porn EVEN for the sake of freedoms we are not better than the offender.”

Separating “porn” from “kiddie porn”

No offence is committed by engaging in the viewing, reading or dissemination of “porn” by to and between adults,

therefore

there is No “Offender”

since there is no “Offender”, your or my approval (or otherwise) is moot.

Conversely, “kiddie porn” involves, by definition “kiddies”.

“Cartoons” are not “kiddies”.

“Cartoons” may well depict something similar to “kiddies”

but they remain crafted images (rather than child images), inscribed and disseminated through visual media.

“On the spiritual plane...its all the same to God.”

And I will be judged by him, not by usurpers of his authority, who pretend to act in his name.


Like chainsmoker said “Why are we wasting resources this way?”

"Lady Chatterley's Love" was, until quite recently considered "Porn"

but now DH Lawrence has been politically "rehabilitated",


(although I do not eat figs)

It is too much like Stalin, "political correctness" and the "bullying arrogance" to pointlessly repress the freedom of individual adults to decide what they will view when their chocie remains among the "legal" ones.
Posted by Col Rouge, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 1:04:03 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
It's the precedent and the hypocrisy that's the problem. It's a reality people like Gibo and the judge will never comprehend due to their own insane hypocrisy.
Posted by StG, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 1:10:21 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. Page 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy