The Forum > General Discussion > Politics in cricket
Politics in cricket
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
What do they all have in common? They were/are all gifted batsmen, who didn't play as many tests for Australia as their talent warranted. They also had the misfortune to not come from NSW and WA, the home states of the preferred batsmen for the Australian team.
Why? If merit is the condition of being selected in the team, why didn't they get selected more often? In the case of Siddons - a Sheffield Shield record run scorer - he never played a single test.
The answer has to be cricket politics. If you were one of the Waughs, you were feted. Steve Waugh (NSW), I seem to remember, had a low batting average after about 20 tests, but still managed to survive till the end of his career. It isn't fair that he made it but others didn't. And it certainly doesn't hurt - as a batsman at least - to come from NSW and WA.
What do others think?