Taryn. I know why you are posting your post. There appears to be no other reason except to discredit me. I don't know why you waste your time. Your version of events and mine is completely different and guess what I am the one living it.

You will recall that I didn't receive the emails that you said that were sent and nobody rang me in relation to it. Had I had received them or had been contacted I would have replied. I have all this confirmed in writing/emails. After all that misunderstanding/mess I did thank you for offering for a Solictor to maybe be able to see us during lunch time during another hearing when the Solicitor was in Sydney but I didn't want to bother you and I thanked you and advised you that I had already instructed solicitors, so why do you spend your time replying and trying to discredit me and then complaining about replying to me? When I said nobody would help me I wasn't speaking about what you present, we were talking about fellow parents and the system. No Solicitor has ever screamed at me to 'leave his office' as you say. Your determination to defame me is truly bizzare and I have to wonder why you feel such need?

If you cannot actually help me with the questions that I present, not just give me your advice on what you think that we should do, then please go and save the animals or something as they seem to be more important to you than humans.

To be continued.

Oh and as for my children, it is the actions and/or lack of action by the DET that concerns them. NOt what I do. Yes they worry about tests but not because of what I might say as they have exceeded my wildest expectations from the day they were born, but they worry because for years and years they have experienced bias, manipulation and tampering with regard to their test scores and the Department have refused to protect them. What I do gives them strength as they are the type who stand up to bullies. They refuse to be victims.

As for this thread. I have completed my FOI submissions. Thank you very much to all of you who helped. It did give me direction to present the case. I really appreciate it.

Taryn was working in our office at the time we tried to assist you. She spent two days typing the background to the lawyer that offered to meet with you.

I think she has every right to comment. That was two days of HER time.
Your selfish Jolanda and I know you have been dishonest because you said nobody had ever offered to help you on another forum.
A retired school teacher was on that forum.
I even gave you the benefit by forwarding you a copy minus the name.
You problem IS its YOU who must be the centre of attention. You see them everday loosing their babies or presenting to hospital with yet again another accident etc...

I DO worry for your kids and I thinks its a criminal they havent had you mentally checked = or your poor kids.

I think your a very clever but very sick lady seeking attention anywhere you can get it.
Thats sad

Say whatever you like PALE but the fact remains that I never got those emails about a meeting date and time and nobody actually rang me about it when I didn't respond to the emails that I didn't receive. They are the facts. That you are intent on wanting to discredit me so long afterwards is not my problem although I cant help but wonder why?

I am an honest and kind person and I am always be grateful for help, you say I got offered something but I didn't get the emails that were said were sent with the information and instead I got a very defaming post posted on Senator Bartletts public blog posted about me. Instead of contacting me! Had I received the emails I would have replied and anybody who actually knows me would vouch for that. I am a woman of my word and straight down the line, I call a spade a spade and I am by nature honest. So why do you keep coming on here for the sole purpose of discrediting me?

Oh and I did go to see a psychologist for the sake of people like you who want to present me as crazy and also took the kids and guess what, she didn't need to see me again and she said that I was a very couragous woman and a good mother and that my children were lucky to have a mother like me.

So why do you insist on wanting to hurt me and my family. Do you not realise that you hurt my children when you attack me? Or do you just not care?

Jolanda

Whatever but its was MYSELF!! who contacted you by phone and told you our lawyer could meet with you either at his motel room or at the airport between flights,.
You said that wasnt long enough to discuss your matter as he knew nothing about it.
I then explained to you it was long enough and that he would only be discussing points of law which in most cases was pretty standard.
As for Andrews web site where I first heard of your problem i agree you didnt get much support from a so called Senator.
Which is why I thought gee thats a bit rough a senator ignoring you when you clearly were asking legal questions that he should have and could have in my opinion assist you with.

I have no interest of hurting you or your kids Jolanda.
I am not that type of person.
We only ever wanted to help- whatever.


.

People against Live Exports it is obvious that you and I have a completely different take on what happened but one thing for sure I didn't deserve what you said in public about me. If for whatever reason we did misunderstand each other, to then publicly present me as being ungrateful, not wanting help and being a risk of harm to my children is really mean.

Anyway have you had a look at my blog lately? I just got some documents that the DET have avoided giving me for years, and guess what, it confirms what I say and that the DET is lying, again and again. I have started uploading the documents.

What I wonder is how many discrepancies, errors, ommissions, deletions, evidence of bias and misconduct is there 'ALLOWED' to be in regards to one family and when it is considered enough to warrant looking into so as to protect the children?

It amazes me that this person at hte Selective SChools Unit can do so much and nobody turns her in.

One error can be seen as a mistake, two as a co-incidence but when it is substantially more than that, then I am sorry it is bias, misconduct and corruption.

Education - Keeping them Honest
Our Children Deserve better
http://jolandachallita.typepad.com/education/