An interesting Christian viewpoint on One World Government can be seen on
http://www.trueconspiracies.com/

A gun club friend in Cairns, Queensland says all of the gun clubbers he knows believe part of the global plan is to disarm the populations so that later...there can be no resistance to the World government police forces.

If "they" are allowed to disarm the people totally it becomes just that much harder to defend Australia in time of invasion.

My friend says that tighter regulations are making it so hard for new people to enter Gunsmithing that they too are under threat of dying out.

Its now almost impossible to camp overnight in most of our own national parks because of international heritage listings.

FG

We either have the choice to beleive the facts by those who created the constitution or we can believe the propoganda created and approved by the government.

HANSARD 10-3-1891 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian Convention)

Dr. COCKBURN:
Parliament has been the supreme body. But when we embark on federation we throw parliamentary sovereignty overboard. Parliament is no longer supreme. Our parliaments at present are not only legislative, but constituent bodies. They have not only the power of legislation, but the power of amending their constitutions. That must disappear at once on the abolition of parliamentary sovereignty. No parliament under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to have the power of changing its constitution at its own will.

Again;
No parliament under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to have the power of changing its constitution at its own will.

http://www.comlaw.gov.au/

If "ignorance" is not an excuse for erring against the law, don't u think that it is unreasonable that they do not teach the basics to the kiddies, not to mention the rest of us?

Bcoz u know, the reason that lawyers can charge as much as they do, and we note a comment from a High Court Poppet re:

"Remorseless Mercantilisation"

is becoz if one does not honour ones obligations to the law, it can bite the living _uck out of u and seriously _uck up yr life and or u can seriously miss out on goldern opportunities or alternatively _ock up the ones u get by unwittingly erring as u go.

It is a disgusting "monopoly." See how many of the polis are legally trained to some extent. Whilst it takes some skill, it is by no means rocket science and unnecessarily kept out of the reach of jack & jill.

Shld u have an issue with the law, departmental brochures and alternative dispute resolution centres can provide u with the knowledge of what law is applicable to yr case and then U wld do well to read the act/s & regs for yrself.

Then, whilst it is still a complicated matter in some cases, u will at least b able to minimise the time that u may need to pay someone by only spending time addressing that which is relevant.

And of course, the material continuum darlings, as the ferrengi call it, the gravy train, the money stream - is for the most part regulated to some extent by the law and by being familiar with it, u can quickly discover where all the "bait balls" are and how "legitimately" to get a piece of the action, should u choose to make this a field of endeavour.

Of course, "plain english" is a work in progress and many of the older acts are a serious "spaghetti bowel" but I assure u all, u have everything to gain and absolutely nothing to lose by checking it out for yrself.

...Adam...

The Constitution provides a mechanism by which it can be altered, called a referendum. Before there can be any change to the Constitution, a majority of electors must vote in favour of the change. In addition, there must be a majority vote in a majority of States, that is, in four out of the six States. (Further, a proposed amendment which would diminish the representation of a State in the Commonwealth Parliament or which would alter the territorial limits of a State must be approved by a majority of electors in that State.) Ordinarily, before a matter can be the subject of a referendum, both Houses of the Commonwealth Parliament must pass the proposed law containing the suggested amendment of the Constitution (section 128).

Chapter VIII – Alteration of the Constitution
128 Mode of altering the Constitution
This Constitution shall not be altered except in the following manner:
..

Chapter III – The Judicature
74 Appeal to Queen in Council
No appeal shall be permitted to the Queen in Council from a decision of the High Court upon any question, howsoever arising, as to the limitsinter se of the Constitutional powers of the Commonwealth and those of any State or States, or as to the limits inter se of the Constitutional powers of any two or more States, unless the High Court shall certify that the question is one which ought to be determined by Her Majesty in Council. The High Court may so certify if satisfied that for any special reason the certificate should be granted, and thereupon an appeal shall lie to Her Majesty in Council on the question without further leave. Except as provided in this section, this Constitution shall not impair any right which the Queen may be pleased to exercise by virtue of Her Royal prerogative to grant special leave of appeal from the High Court to Her Majesty in Council. The Parliament may make laws limiting the matters in which such leave may be asked,17 but proposed laws containing any such limitation shall be reserved by the Governor-General for Her Majesty’s
pleasure.

But, the so called Australia Act
(doh comm law has just gone down from here)
purports to have removed appeals to *Lizzie Winza* and in effect altered the above. This change was not done by referendum pursuant to S128.

The change was done allegedly upon request of the australian guvment to the pommie guvment who did up the so called australia act, in their view trumping OUR CONSTITUTION and bypassing the req for referendum and s128. Thus, OUR CONSTITUTION, was never really a consitution at all, or alternatively, the australia act shld be overturned as bits of it are inconsistent with the CONSTITUTION, the so called supreme foundation stone upon which all other australian law sits.

CONSTITUTION overtrumps FEDERAL overtrumps STATE,to the extent of their respective inconsistencies and NO the pomms did not have the legal authority to change the Australian CON, at the behest of the slime in Canberra or otherwise.

And this. U may b familiar with the so called concept of
Terra Nullius (A land of no Human Beings)

Of course, everyone knew there were BlakFellas here.

But, according to their own law, they had to either declare WAR on the BlakFella or make a !TREATY!
(I luv the song)

But mayhaps they wanted not a war and to risk losing Oz in the manner that they lost n.america and mayhaps ordinary poms wanted not more GENOCIDE, as was inflicted on the indigenous n.americans leading to a bloodthirsty lot who turned on the crown,

AND they wanted not to share with the Original Australians.

So, instead, they classified the BlakFellas as animals and unleashed the convicts.
(Here again, "How the abused become the Abusers.)

(Constitution Alteration (Aboriginals) 1967
(No. 55 of 1967)- YES after the end of HITLER & WWII
Afterall, why bother counting them if u just want to slaughter, rape, enslave and pillage and risk a LEGAL CHALLENGE.

Now, MABO. And the High Court overturned "Terra Nullius" noting that yes indeed folks, the BlakFellas are Human Beings and we always knew it,

BUT

sh!t themselves at the point of applying relevant associated law from the time, that is TREATY or WAR and thus australia remains a
ROGUE STATE in my view.

And that is also why, hopefully, there remains a
BLAKFELLA EMBASSY and an ongoing CALL for TREATY or something which unites and is mutually acceptable to all of "Good Will."

So to hear these <snip> going on about their precious genocidal crown and their rule of law and how magnificent their predicated upon no money no justice legal system is;

is to me just a sick joke and makes me want to puke.

Even now, child abusers come in all colours. Why then only then micro manage those who are original australians pursuant to SS law and not ALL child abusers on SS.