A conspiracy to alter what our forefathers established under God for the good of the Australian people?
I think it exists.

I think the republic movement has some dark intentions behind it.

I probably wouldnt be wrong if I said the republicans would want the Constitution "re-arranged" to suit the plans of World Government.
Change the current flag, get rid of the Royal household, change this act and that act, get prayer out of parliament etc...oppress the people and their freedoms through acts of parliament.

Back in the 70's Garry Allen wrote a book called NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY about world government and groups like the Bilderbergers.

Stan Deyo also wrote a book called THE COSMIC CONSPIRACY similar to Garrys but with The Gospel preached.

Come to 1980s Barry Smith (NZ) was writing about the same Illuminati/Bilderberger groups striving for global control in WARNING, SECOND WARNING and FINAL NOTICE.

So whats clear in it all?
What clear comes from Gods Word in Revelation 13:16-18.
"He (the beast) forced all of the people, rich and poor, to receive a mark (also read microchip possible) on his right hand or forehead, so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast, or the number of his name". This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is a mans number. His number is 666".

So there it is.
The World Government system is looking for an Adolf Hitler, for surely he turns out to be one, to sort out global problems and the final economy is a mark/ID tag.
The Bible in Revelation 14:9-11 says we are not to take it.
This is all "the Bible look" at the future.

Yes...there are men in this country who want to alter good things for the sake of submission to World Government.

tapp,

Its always a good idea to have a copy of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia open beside you if you want to talk about it.

Your broad-brush statements relating to the NSW Constitution Act 1902, and the constitutionality of NSW legislation passed subsequently to that date, betray some possible misunderstanding on your part. Section 106 of the Commonwealth Constitution states:

"106. The Constitution of each State of the Commonwealth shall, subject to this Constitution, continue as at the establishment of the Commonwealth, or as at the admission or establishment of the State, as the case may be, until altered in accordance with the Constitution of the State."

To further clarify the position with respect to State legislation, Section 109 of the Constitution states:

"109. When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid."

Do you know of some specific instance where the NSW Constitution Act was altered inconsistently with regard to the provisions within that Act relating to alteration thereof?

A copy of the Constitution (as altered to 30 June 1987) has been printed for the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.

The Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia has also historically been reprinted in each edition of the Year Books, now referred to as Year Book Australia, with the relevant year appended to the title. Editions of the Year Book prior to 1967 would show the text of the now repealed Section 127, which for some reason is not shown in the struck-through form otherwise used to reveal the precise nature of any alteration to the original text, in the Parliament reprinting of 1987.

Your claim that it was the intention of the framers of the Commonwealth Constitution that all State constitution alterations post-Federation required to be submitted to referendum in their respective States requires a specific reference, and in any case was there to have been any such intention, it was not embodied in the original Constitution as enacted.

Hi foxy. Yes, you are 100% correct. I fall short on half of that myself. Gibo made an interesting point about the sharky motives for constitutional change, and to be honest, with forrest, tapp, posts, I am clearly out gunned when it comes to the intricate workings, other than common knowledge of the norm.
I think I'll leave it to the professionals.

EVO

Dear Evo,

Me too.

And, probably most of the country
as well.

Tapp,
I have contempt for political parties does that help?

gibo,
I'd like to see a government that is a democracy one be it State, Federal or world. So far we as a species have only managed to intall more complex variant forms of tribal (mis quoted) Darwinism. "Survival of the fitest." As for religions, our supersticions are just more ritually and doctrinally complex.
:-o

Well that does help as long as you can stand up for yourself.

FG
Whilst i go through my data to find that reference we can look at the nationality and citizenship act 1948.

Now since states have the responsibility of citizenship as per what the framers of the constitution had written we also come about to dual citizenship as well, which is between the states and commonwealth.