The Forum > General Discussion > Is this the End-times for US World Domination
Is this the End-times for US World Domination
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
![]() Syndicate RSS/XML ![]() |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Not if the republicans get their way, of course the left of American politics is no different to the left of any other – weak willed, seeking subsidies, incapable of placing responsibility where it belongs.
As for “BTW, Health Care for children was, at $9 billion, considered too expensive”
Having children is not a right; it is personal choice and a responsibility.
If you want children, they cost money, be prepared to pay for them
It is the morally feeble who feel entitled to have children but then expect the state to hand them every form of subsidy as reward for their ‘copulatory’ effort.
Imho, we have too many children in care and foster homes because their morally inadequate parents are dysfunctionally incapable of shouldering their responsibilities.
Arjay “Can we rely on the US if China or Russia become aggressive in our region?”
Well the US did come up to the plate for WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam (after the French failed). They also oversaw the dismantling of the USSR threat and Nixon commenced the China dialogue.
We have a treaty with US. I think that says it.
I recall Bill Hayden, one time leader of Australian Labor party, commenting that Australia needed a nuclear deterrent to keep Indonesia in check, I guess we have managed to rely on USA for that too.
msanne “The response from the GOP?A 700 billion dollar bailout”
actually the GOP is the ones who are holding the line.
You write as if you are an US citizen?
Am I correct or not?
as for “eight years of national embarrassment”
short or very selective memory.
Bill Clintons antics with “our Monica” (mouth organ (harmonica)) who he did not have sex with (unless she swallowed) were moments of national pride?
For all his failings (of which there are many) at least Bush is not perceived as someone who cannot keep it in his pants or bonks the interns in the oval office.