The dishonest and lying antiseptic has failed to provide, after 46 pages, even one bit of "proof" that the CSA adopted illegal behaviour in their dealings with him.

SillyG:"the CSA adopted illegal behaviour in their dealings with him."

Not always illegal, Silly, sometimes it was just incompetent. Your friend JW, remarkably managed to achieve both incompetence and dishonesty. Sadly, you've not managed to achieve more than risibility.

The lying and dishonest antiseptic "knows" the subject matter of his refusal to answer the question about his claims of criminal CSA behaviour are NOT about incompetence, but "illegality". His lying and dishonesty are obviously hard traits to shake.

The lying and dishonest antiseptic has failed to provide, after 47 pages, even one tiny bit of "proof" that the CSA adopted illegal behaviour in their dealings with him.

I've now given the dishonest and lying antiseptic a further day to provide "proof" of his allegations of criminal CSA actions.

Yet still, after 47 pages, the dishonest and lying antiseptic continues to fail to provide even one tiny bit of "proof" of CSA illegality in their dealings with him.

That says it all!

I'm very happy to have had the opportunity to clear that up.

SillyG:"antiseptic continues to fail to provide even one tiny bit of "proof" of CSA illegality in their dealings with him"

While Silly continues to demonstrate she is obsessed with me.

BTW, Silly, if you want proof, you'll have to give me your full name and address; I'd be happy to send you all the proof you need.

Oh, that's right, it was your friend JW who claimed she "considered nothing to be private" then disappeared once her identity was discovered, wasn't it? As you were, then.

Still, after 47 pages, the dishonest and lying antiseptic refuses to provide on these public pages even one tiny bit of "proof" regarding his accusations of illegal CSA behaviour towards him.

That says it all.

I'm happy to have been presented with the opportunity to clear that up.