The Forum > General Discussion > MEAA Code of Ethics
MEAA Code of Ethics
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
- 2
-
- All
How do you people see the usefulness and effectiveness of the MEAA Code of Ethics these days? What issues do you think arise from the codes today? For example, governing some parts of it my be difficult, particularly with the rise of the internet and the corporisation of the media.
Posted by Cadet, Thursday, 15 May 2008 9:30:09 PM
| |
errr....*curious look*..... what the HECK is the MEAA?
Posted by BOAZ_David, Friday, 16 May 2008 8:05:24 AM
| |
How do YOU see it, and then WE can take it from there.
Posted by StG, Friday, 16 May 2008 8:54:44 AM
| |
http://www.australian-news.com.au/codethics.htm
any of the other links wouldn't open. The headline answers the question; Journalists code of ethics - an oxymoron? Posted by individual, Friday, 16 May 2008 10:18:49 AM
| |
Dear Cadet,
Most media journalists belong to the Australian Journalists Association, a division of a trade union called the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA). Members are required to follow a 12 point code of ethics. Alliance members engaged in journalism commit themselves to: Honesty Fairness Independence Respect for the rights of others To see the full code: www.australian-news.com.au/codethics.htm - 16k - How relevant is the code to today's media? In practical terms it sounds idealistic. Of course it would be wonderful if journalists did report and interpret honestly, striving for accuracy, fairness and disclosure of all essential facts. If they did not suppress relevant available facts or give distorting emphasis and if they did their uttmost to give a fair opportunity for reply. But the reality is often very different - as we all know. Respect for truth and the public's right to information - often comes in second to what "sells," and the political agenda that follows. Posted by Foxy, Friday, 16 May 2008 10:20:27 AM
| |
I think reporters are generally far better than they're given credit for. I think the public often confuses opinion writers and journalists, and so complain, completely redundantly, that Andrew Bolt is biased. (Of course he's biased — that's his job. He's not a reporter.)
The problem in the media, I believe, has little to do with journalists not following the code of ethics. It has to do with newspapers failing to provide adequate support to investigative journalists, and sending talented people off ambulance chasing instead. I think it has enormously to do with the proliferation of entertainment reporting and stupid, cliched blogs about relationships. Go have a look at The Age or the SMH online (reputedly our best papers) then go have a look at The Guardian or the New York Times online. Then pour yourself a whisky. Then weep quietly in to it. Posted by Vanilla, Friday, 16 May 2008 6:24:56 PM
|