PF... Ozzie is completely fine about an apolagy when shes in the wrong, especially when she knows you havent overreacted like another 'superior princess' on this forum..further to which I believe you are at least a straight up kind of person, unlike a lot on here..so that is to be respected..

She wont be back..nothing like a good witch hunt for something that nearly everyone else on this forum is doing, ie:multiple ids, yes even Celivia (I heard that from a very reliable source, also Scout is Robert..:))Perhaps people in glass houses shouldnt throw stones.

Everyone on here has used more than one name..to have access to more posts and variuos other more unsavoury reasons.

Leigh you know nothing about this 'monkey' person, so hearsay and gossip are surely beneath you? Gossip never pays.

WAYFARER,

I assume, in claiming the use of multiple IDs by almost everyone that uses this forum, that you are fairly experienced in the use and ways of the forum. I am therefore prepared to accept what you say may have some truth to it. (I would also like to make the point that I have not ever, in my very short time in this forum, used any other posting ID. In this arena, less may well be more. I think it pays to learn the discipline of working within the rules, to talk less, and read more. That way, when you do post, the likelihood of it being worth reading by others may be increased.) Accordingly, I would suggest that the forum administrators look at the feasibility of attaching a marker to all user identities that post from the same ISP account, if that can be engineered and is legally possible. Such a marker, whilst not an infallible indicator, may then forewarn that a poster may be attempting to buck the system, and the credibility of the post be reduced accordingly in the eyes of other forum users, especially those using the forum for political sampling purposes.

To now attempt to refocus upon the topic, let me ask, have you ever considered that multiple IDs might be widespread in the real deal, ie. enrolling and claiming votes at elections? If that was occurring to any significant extent you would think the chances of election of more aboriginal representatives would be increased, wouldn't you? Unless, of course, the persons using multiple IDs were not really interested in increasing aboriginal representation in the Parliament. I don't know. What do you think?

BTW, who is the other 'superior princess' on the forum? As a relative newbie, I would like to be forewarned.

Forrest,

I am hardly likely to be that easyily drawn as a gossip on a public forum, suffice to say it will become clear the longer you post..

You speak of the rules on this forum..well you are in for a shock if you think that they mean anything at all.

Ive learned that the hard way.

So beware , watch your back..this is a political forum and just the very word 'political' implies dishonesty, subtle but mostly not so subtle.

If you upset the wrong person on here..you too will be the victim of your own witch hunt, right or wrong doesnt come into it.When you do,if you do,you will see how the rules are nothing more than a means to end that have nothing to do with free speech or equality for all under the rules.

"Everyone on here has used more than one name..to have access to more posts and variuos other more unsavoury reasons."

Actually not so Wayfarer. I know a few who have done that,
when caught they were banned. I have posted under my same
name from day one. So what you are claiming is clearly wrong!

Yabby if your going to have the temerity to quote me , please do it correctly..I said '..nearly everyone...'?

I know you havent but I also know a lot on here who do and dont 'fess up out there in the carpark..letting OG cop all the heat and even having the ordacity to invent ways to keep her out..I notice they are the proponents of not wanting the anonymous posting eliminated lest they be found out and if you look its interesting whos on that list..the biggest protestors in fact....they dont want real identities used because they are guilty of what they are crucifying OG for.]

In that list is Celivia, Robert and PF and others..I know for sure that 2 of those 3 are a strongly suspect another.

So, no you arent but some of your friends do.

Wayfarer, if you check your post of Friday the 27th, I snipped
your post word for word, so no misquotes at all! You said it,
I copied and pasted it.

Lots of allegations about double postings, also lots of speculation
and conspiracy theories, just very little evidence. With some,
there was clearly evidence. I happen to agree, people should abide
by the rules, I have no objection for any ways found to make them
play by the rules. They fall or stand by their ability to reason,
given limited words.

IMHO OLO is a place for some serious debate about various political,
economic and social issues, so I try and focus on that. There
are some bright minds on here.

OG in my opinion saw it more as a housewives chat club. All very
well, but wrong place. Perhaps she should have started her own
corner for that, much like the Carpark is for resolving disputes.