No Gibo, he did challenge you.

You just chose to say he is wrong, so you had an excuse to ignore the question.

Again - where's the proof of demons? Philo's pointed out that all the demons in the bible could just as easily have been psychological 'demons' as it were.

What's more, there's no evidence in reality or anywhere that demons exist.

But you don't want to accept that. So you'll take recourse in some obscure section of text to justify your position.

While most of you babble along with this subject, your freedoms are taken away very slowly but surely, as (this subject and others)it is another way to keep your mind distracted from the real issues of survival, right down to your cellular levels.Instead of believing in life itself and just look around you what is being done to other life forms by companies and their scientists.
b.t.w. it's easier to control people when you hurd them into groups when each member takes on an identity as "I am a cristian", etc.
If you were to connect all the dots spelled out in this forum's titles, you'd have to conclude that there is no interest in survival or survival of life itself. Take for example 'nano tech','the demise of bees', 'GM introduction', just to name a few.
We could be discussing instead: who controls the food, water, air, is in power of the masses.You think?

eftfnc, if that's your concern, then by all means, start a thread.

The problem is, your comment there, invariably dismisses any discussion that isn't about that particular topic as worthless.

Evidently you see some conspiratorial thread running through the topics you just mentioned, but I see them as quite separate issues or a fairly broad topic of globalisation and capitalism, which do get quite extensive discussion on these boards.

Boazy: "It gets even weirder when a cult splits into a sub cult"

You mean like when the Exclusive Brethren broke away from the Open Brethren, for instance?

TRTL

I would of thought your out and out misrepresentation of Christian groups in the thread you started recently might have embarassed you into silence. Since you don't believe in God it is interesting that you try to highlight peoples different theological views.

It wasn't a misrepresentation at all runner, not even the slightest bit.

You saying it is, doesn't make it so.

I highlighted several groups that are being attacked by the media. I made no judgement on the accuracy of these claims, though I think it's most likely that these groups are indeed as shonky as is being claimed.

I then put it to Christians, as to whether they would condemn these movements instantaneously - as is asked of Muslims whenever a fringe group pops up.

You just don't get it. It was an attempt to see if fundamentalist christians would be able to understand what it's like to be treated in this manner.

Evidently you don't like being in that position. Surprise surprise, I doubt the muslim populace likes it either.

I didn't attempt to claim that muslims groups weren't more dangerous, nor did I attempt to claim that all christians were like these groups.

I was testing the waters and seeing if people are willing to open their minds and put themselves in other people's shoes.

But your posts reveal you to be quite bad at that.

Your constant attacks on abortions and homosexuality reveal how little credence you give to any view that doesn't subscribe to the Catholic interpretation.

I'd say you should be embarrassed for making such a one-sided sniping post, especially seeing as you haven't actually tackled anything I've said with any depth or understanding.