Branco
I disagree with you. They voted what is best for them not only because they want to transfer the difficult job to charities but because they think we are IDIOTS and partly they have right.

Leigh, you have no interest in Workchoices, being retired. What about your children, grand children, friends, about me. Are you really so selfish?
We gave a good lesson to conservatives last elections, Howard was the champion. It's up to us to make sure the liberals hear our message about Workchioices, loud and clear.
Antonios Symeomakis
Adelaide

No AS, I am not in the least selfish. You only think I am because my opinions don't match yours. There is nothing I can do about Workchoices, and only a fool worries about things he has no control over.

Some people claim to be better off under Workchoices, others don't. The ALP promised to abolish the system. They are now in government, so it's up to them to abolish it. Not me, not you. You have one vote, the same as I have.

I see what BD and others mean about Julie. She is an idiot. Just keepings yapping without listening.

I do not post here to tell why Julie posts such rot, it is time wasting.
But I post to remind every one workchoices is dead.
However it will take time, the promised end was not day one of Rudd's rule.
He does not control the senate and another Julie is intent on her leadership campaign, she wants to be seen as a hard lady.
She will try to stand in the way.
John Howard never fought the 2004 election on workchoices, my side of politics the ALP fought a dreadful fight and gave him the senate.
He imposed his will workchoices.
This election was fought on workchoices Labor has a mandate.
It will be removed I dream of the senate saying no way!
Such a move would result in a double dissolution of both houses and the fight to lead the Titanic would be both very long and have many victors before a return to office.