The Forum > General Discussion > Birth choices why so few available?
Birth choices why so few available?
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
- Pages:
-
- Page 1
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
Women spoke of the reasons why they have chosen this birth option for their birth- not being listened to, being ignored, felt they were on a production line, not told why things were done to them or a horrific birth experience with their previous child.
It was so sad that mainstream birth is so horrific that these women are 'forced' into searching out other options. There was a woman who was 34 weeks, 6 weeks to go who had yet to book into a hospital searching for a midwife who could offer the choice of birth she wanted.
There are so few midwives working independently because they cannot get professional indemnity insurance or admitting rights to a hospital. Doctors have monopolised these aspects for so long. It is now time to consider the safety of these women. If they could not find a midwife they claimed they would free birth - i.e. no attending midwife or Dr.
Why are Obstetricians, specialists in abnormal or high risk referred low risk healthy women for their care by GP's? Why can't Australia have a system like in NZ where midwives can be the leading care provider with referral options to the specialist if/when needed? Why are women so lowly they do not get any choice, especially if they have private health insurance? Why do some hospitals have a 90% caesarean section rate? Why do we spend so much money when care by a known midwife is the cheapest and by WHO the gold standard for healthy low risk women? People start asking these questions please!