philo, strangely enough I've not noticed your contributions on the issue of children being removed from their biological fathers via the family law system.

A much larger problem where actual children are removed from the care of a parent who does love them to suit the lifestyle, financial or vengence preferences of the other parent. A real issue as opposed to the small number of homosexual couples who may succeed in addopting a child (where the option of access to biological parents is already unavailable anyway) or who may use medical intervention to secure a child.

There may be odd situations such as the one you describe, if so they are at the extreme and still nothing has been said that indicates a specific risk to a child. Children are far more at risk in families where they are unwanted than when being raised by a parent or parents who really want them.

If you are really concerned for the wellbeing of children focus your efforts where the risks are rather than on relationship types which you disapprove of. If homosexual parents present an unacceptable risk to children show us the independant research which backs up that claim.

R0bert

Philo of course he thinks of kids as a commodity because thats how homos think of kids and he follows them normally.

Jack and mj you are spot on homos know they are wrong so they use words like that. They know numbsculls won't tolerate disagreement if its called homophobic and they think a wrong is okay if homos call it a civil right and they think they have to give full assistance to every whim of perverts if they call themselves a minority group. Homos lead them by the nose.

For those of you who can't see damage to kids beyond molesting how do you know homos don't intend to but keep it quiet because numbsculls aren't ready for that yet? How is it that when people resisting homo rights demands said that homos agenda was to redefine marriage homo activists acted offended and called it hysterical bigotry yet now they ask for gay marriage? How is it that homo activists inisted their sexual perversion was a lifestyle choice but now swear blindly they are born that way? Wjhats the story morning glory? Right now most of these perverts say the important thing is consenting adults and claim it is hysterical bigotry to associate them with child molestors but it sounds too familiar why don't I trust them?

Jw2040 you are a clever little chap. "By way of response to J Bennett, can I just say that I share TRTL's agenda." "I'm very grateful to those whose sense of justice compels them to seek equality for others."

Fancy twisting of things aside your probably half right. Your disrespect for women was obvious with the ditzy comment but you pretend to respect women you think you can use. You are also clever to talk about other peoples ill will after all your hatred and name calling. Your followers will think you are a nice guy and anyone who politely disagrees is the one with ill will.

Ciao Jpw2040. None of my business but I wonder who you are frying and where. I suspect you will fry them quite vigorously.

Well things have got quieter in here. Has Jw2040 run out of hateful comments and names to call people or is it just hard to argue much of the pro-homo nonsense.

Rboert you don't solve a problem by making more problems not all kids are in ideal circumstances but that doesn't mean adopted kids should be worse off. Anyone who wants to adopt obviously wants the kid so bad things in other situations that don't apply aren't important to this argument and there is no argument that kids shouldn't be removed from other types of abuse environments. I bet you are just parroting that diversion from somethng some homo tried to con you with. Fine other problems should be dealt with but why create more? You said having 3 mums and a dad is extreme but most won't have either a mum or a dad if homos get their hands on them. How is that less extreme? Also, don't people with one type of mental illness often have others so what if they want to interfere with the kids?

"Once I would have agreed with you on this issue but I've taken the effort to ask what evidence backs that claim and many others. Often the answer is none or if evidence exists it is seriously compromised evidence."

That is sad that you didn't support this ugly thing but somehow you changed your mind. What evidence did you find that kids living with homos is a good thing? What evidence did you find that there is no benefit having a father and mother in SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES. I'm not shouting just don't know how else to highlight because you normally compare chalk and cheese which isn't an argument. Also, admit that you think homos are normal because I think that is your main problem.

J Bennett
Here here- Well said

Thanks I appreciate it.