The Forum > General Discussion > Should gay partnerships be recognised legally?
Should gay partnerships be recognised legally?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Page 46
-
- All
Posted by JamesH, Monday, 14 January 2008 8:05:48 AM
| |
Be clear that I am not trying to completely get away from the issue of perverts bringing up children as being a problem by itself but am just raising an additional concern with the molestation. While I'm at it I notice that people who support homos seem to have a chip on their shoulder about their parents or parenting or like the rear action like Mr Morgan or were brainwashed by parents. That is why they can't think for themselves.
"Why are some people so *desperate* to find gay men perverts?" Botheration funny you should put it like that but I know what you mean. "they'd be working with low-income, broken families to support step-fathers and disaffected dads, and they'd be trying to reduce the number of wards of the state, who are abused at an alarming rate. In truth, they don't give a sh!t about the kids, they want to talk about how perverse fags are." In truth those things are no excuse to add more ugliness and it is too late to stop them and they won't change overnight or by not talking about homos getting their hands on kids. In your January 11 post you sound like John Cleese's character in Faulty Towers. The difference between the robotic barber shop and homos molesting is there is good grounds for suspicion and no chances should be taken with kids safety. Homos are already perverts with a similar condition to paedophiles, people often have more than one mental illness so why not similar ones, and the only people who know for sure are homos and they don't have a good history of being honest about their agenda. Of course something always leaks out (although lucky I checked it today as it wasn't working and I needed to get it from archive). Here is a link from an honest homo in America who names a bunch of politicians with similar views and it is obvious from his writing that he knows others of his persuasion agree with him. If they all disagreed why would he bother with the website? http://web.archive.org/web/20070710185136/http://www.actwin.com/eatonohio/gay/ophocounton.html Posted by J Bennett, Monday, 14 January 2008 9:13:31 AM
|
http://www.canadiancrc.com/female_sexual_predators_awareness.aspx
86% of the victims of female sexual predators aren't believed, so the crimes go unreported and don't get prosecuted.
Considering these facts, arrest statistics for child sexual offenders by gender are meaningless.
From "The Sexual Abuse by Women of Children and Teenagers"
UK TV programme - Panorama - BBC1 - 10 pm Monday, October 6th, 1997
When girls do it: an examination of female sexual predators
The Canadian Children's Rights Council recommends this video documentary to all law makers, police, child protection workers, educators, school teachers and organizations concerned about recognizing female sexual predators.
This documentary originally aired on CTV in August, 2001
Reporter comments about a female sexual predator:
"In September 1997, she was making her first court appearance and I remember the first time I saw her I was immediately flabbergasted because she looked so innocent. She was so slight, small in her build, and so young, and I thought, 'she can't be a sex offender, it's impossible.'"
- Reporter Cheryl Jahn, speaking about convicted sexual offender Crystal Henricks
From the website of "When Girls Do It" ( website deleted Oct. /04)
"When Girls Do It" is a 45-minute video examining the motivations of female sexual predators, the destructive effects of their actions on their victims, and the reluctance of victims to come forward.
"When Girls Do It" features compelling testimony and powerful interviews with survivors of abuse by female sexual offenders, therapists, and psychologists. The documentary delves into related issues including the long-held misconception that sexual abuse of children is exclusively a male crime.