The Forum > General Discussion > THE RUDDSLIDE MUST BE CONTAINED.
THE RUDDSLIDE MUST BE CONTAINED.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
- 5
-
- All
The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
You claim that: "When Kevin Rudd was in charge of health in Queensland 60% of the health budget went on bureaucrats instead of front line services." Would you care to document that? What's evidence can you give us?
Do I hear a whiff of an argument from you that Parliament should be elected only by the people who 'understand'? Who was it that argued that a blatant voting gerrymander represented 'the permanent will of the people' as opposed to the will of the hoi poloi who didn't really understand? If only the people weren't so stupid, eh? Should be deprived of the vote for getting it so wrong?
I would have thought that what the people can do in one election they could easily undo at the next. They all have the same voting power. That's not a quadratic equation - or rocket science.
Quoting NSW as an example of how hard it is to get rid of an incompetent government won't cut ice. Have you thought that maybe it's because the Liberal opposition are so hopelessly incompetent that the people of NSW are prepared to return an incompetent government because the alternative would be considerably worse?
Maybe an equally valid case would be how hard it's been to get rid of the Howard government - now there's incompetence for you; and we've had to put up with it for four long terms. But those of us who don't like Howard and his policies don't bleat about the "seduction" of the 'gullible" people.
Arjay's Principle of Democratic Merit: If the Coalition win, that's because Australians are smart; if Labor wins "they have seduced a gullible ignorant young vote with rock populism".