The Forum > General Discussion > Should the Prime Minister (be it Howard or Rudd), make a formal apology to the Aboriginal people?
Should the Prime Minister (be it Howard or Rudd), make a formal apology to the Aboriginal people?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Page 5
- 6
- 7
-
- All
who should appologise to whom ? well, the australian like many other aboriginal people have copped a whack alright, there's no dispute about it. The islanders ? well, not really. Theirs' is a totally different scenario. The ones who are claiming victimisation now are in fact the descendants of the perpetrators whereas the aborigine's forebears have been well & truly displaced. Now, who displaced the aborigines' forebears ? It was the forebears of the many who have either come to this country involuntary or voluntary in later years. So, in actual fact we somehow have to give a posthumous appology & just as somehow get it accepted posthumously. On what grounds could any descendants to either offer or accept an appology. I hear daily about the lack of this'n that in aboriginal communities. These claims always relate to commodities which are produced through effort by using land formerly occupied by aborigines. I believe that all the services extended to the indigenous of Australia more than equal what has been taken from them. Occupying another land is invasion when it's just taken. However, when the inhabitant of that land does not realise the land's potential & eagerly accepts the goods that come from that land by the effort of the new inhabitant then I fail to see any moral obligation to appologise. Have the aborigines themselves appologised to the tribes they used to raid & never gave anything for it?