The Forum > General Discussion > The Quiet War
The Quiet War
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
-
- All
| The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
| About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
What, in your opinion, is “not true” :-
You probably have not read a book?
You have no interest in Australia, society or anything else?
You trawl for the most obscure, nutty ideas online? .. and/or…
You use this site as a pissing contest?
That's what I said AFTER your uninformed response to my original post.
Did you not understand that my post was a review/summary of an article/commentary by Major General Mick Ryan.
Here's a clue: I quoted him in the first line!
Another tip: reviewing the work of others - an expert on this case - has nothing to do with “(my) arguments". I'm not arguing anything.
“Declaring” war went out with button up boots. Australia would never “declare” war on China. Australia is not able to make war on Lilliput. Neither would China extend the courtesy to Australia. They would just start firing missiles. No Queensbury Rules for the Commos.
And how long would we “last in days”? One or two, probably; and what? You think that has something to do with the possibility of not being attacked by China. Our lack of preparation is what is making it easier for China, which is not going to say, “Oh, we shouldn't be bullies and attack poor little Australia because it can't defend itself”.
I haven't got a clue how your fourth paragraph fits into what happens here.
Finally, of course we would bloody well lose! That's the point! That's what people who know what they are talking about are trying to get through the thick skulls of Australian politicians who have shamefully trashed our ability to defend Australia.