Without our system as is we would be we would be autocratic and communist.

Indy,

In your paranoia hatred of public servants, that's not lying, many times on this forum you made the demand that 95% of public servants should be sacked. That's police officers, nurses, teachers, care givers fire fighters etc etc even the bloke who pays your welfare. Now, do you deny saying that, if you do then you are the liar! Such a demand comes, because of your bitterness and hatred towards public servants.

Paul1405,
Do us & yourself a favour & don't try so hard to sound so silly.
All these professions you claim I want to have sacked is beyond stupid. It's the bad & useless among them as you stated yourself a few posts ago who need to be weeded via natural attrition. The fact that these bad ones make up a huge part of the PS is not me lying, it's you trying to cover up because you appear to be one of them. Why not try hanging out with the good ones & see for yourself !
had the Goaf not stuffed upon so badly by removing National Service* things would be actually quite good by now.
* All he had to do is to pull Australian soldiers out fighting wars in other countries..

Indy,

PLEASE EXPLAIN your figure of 95%, it was an actual number you bandied about on this forum, don't deny it, you were being very specific, you said 95% of public servants should be sacked. PLEASE EXPLAIN why you want 19 out of 20 public servants sacked, that figure can't be achieved unless you have mass sacking of police officers, nurses, teachers etc etc and of course the bloke who has been paying your unjustified welfare payments all these years! Now he should be sacked for wasting our taxpayer money by throwing it at YOU! Don't try to weasel out of what you said!

Paul1405,
Natural attrition is not sacking and, yes the majority aren't doing their job properly & should be moved to private enterprise where they'd need to earn their salaries instead of just receiving money for very, little.
Three office staff & thirty field workers performed better than the thirty field workers under fifteen + office staff now. I'll let you work out the percentage.

Indy,

You never mentioned "natural attrition" at all, you said SACKED! So natural attrition you now say, by the time 95% fall of the perch, the other 5% would as old as YOU and like YOU, totally useless.

Even your example shows how stupid YOU are; thirty field workers under fifteen + office staff. SACK 95% that leaves no office staff and 3 fields workers, running around like chook's without their heads, not knowing what to do