The Forum > General Discussion > Should The Hard Right Of The Coalition Join One Nation?
Should The Hard Right Of The Coalition Join One Nation?
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Page 6
-
- All
| The National Forum | Donate | Your Account | On Line Opinion | Forum | Blogs | Polling | About |
![]() |
Syndicate RSS/XML |
|
| About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy |
The history of the Libertarian/ Industrialist movement seems to contain both Libertarian's as well as the Traditionalist's that it replaced, before the rise of Marxism and it's variants after the French Revolution. Sadly the domination of the Libertarian Industrialist's has lost the faith of the Traditionalist's within the broader movement and now Parties such as the Liberal Party face a split and alienation of the stabilizing traditional components of the public.
It's interesting in the decline of workplace unionism (and traditional media) the Marxist's seem to have replaced the leadership vacuum. What other industry takeovers will the Marxist's target, in the shifting sands of western institutions.
Frank Kitson in Low Level Insurgency talks about the four stages of "Marxist Coup" tactics.
Others such as Aristotle, Hobbes, Patrick Deneen, and Confucist scholar Zhu Xi (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhu_Xi) talk about the concept of "man tending to badness" and therefore needing to be encouraged through society to support "stable societal structures". They had the view that, because man was "naturally bad and destructive", society needs to be ordered in a way that produced good citizens, through education/ military service/ laws/ etc, that preserved societies structure. Others such as Locke and Mencius believed that man was "naturally good".
National Service seeks to ensure stability of the society by protecting it from foreign invaders and creating an awareness of foreign threats in the minds of it's population