The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > General Discussion > Which is more divisive?

Which is more divisive?

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 8
  7. 9
  8. 10
  9. Page 11
  10. 12
  11. 13
  12. All
It appears that both Paul1405 and John Daysh have cultures that predispose them to being complicit apologists for the mass rape of white women. This deserves some analysis, as to why Paul1405 claiming to be from Aboriginal Culture, and John Daysh apparently supporting many Woke Marxist positions, would support damage to white women in particular, and white culture more broadly. This analysis could be used, for example, to understand the Woke Marxist relationship with other cultures.

In other places mass rape of white women in different forms has also occurred, with similar complicit apologism.

From DuckAI- "Apologism refers to the practice of defending a particular belief or doctrine, often in a religious context, through systematic argumentation and discourse."

It seems that Woke Marxism has a doctrine of destabilizing and destroying all cultures, but especially the powerful white Anglo-European cultures either by foreign cultures and/ or self hating Anglo-European sub-cultures.

http://bigthink.com/the-present/yuri-bezmenov/

"In 1984, a former KGB agent named Yuri Bezmenov claimed that Russia has a long-term goal of ideologically subverting the U.S. He described the process as "a great brainwashing" that has four basic stages: demoralization, destabilization, crisis, and normalization."
Posted by Canem Malum, Wednesday, 17 September 2025 11:20:55 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
According to US Hebrew Foreign Affairs Realist expert Henry Kissinger the US is in the second cold war with the new centre of Marxism "China".

http://english.ahram.org.eg/News/492462.aspx

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Communiqu%C3%A9s
Posted by Canem Malum, Wednesday, 17 September 2025 11:33:38 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The 100 year old Kissinger said in an interview with the Spanish newspaper " El Mundo" in 2023 ..."that a new cold war may break out between China and the United States" Kudos Kid said; "According to US Hebrew Foreign Affairs Realist expert Henry Kissinger... "the US is in the second cold war with the new centre of Marxism "China"." Nothing of the sorts was said by Kissinger, a few weeks before his death. The only ones promoting war with China is America, and far right extremists on this little forum, aided and abetted by Trump and his ridiculous economic and foreign policies. KK the space cadet you need to get a grip on it, or let it go altogether!
Posted by Paul1405, Wednesday, 17 September 2025 1:22:45 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The only ones promoting war with China is America
Paul1405,
Wrong, so utterly & totally wrong ! It's the parasitic Left that causes so much friction world-wide. Look at the sillies; the Germans, French, Dutch & other so-called civilised societies led by the Leftists of Not-so Great Britain. It's their antics that cause the friction with China & Russia.
Posted by Indyvidual, Thursday, 18 September 2025 2:17:18 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Canem Malum,

Calling me or Paul "complicit apologists for the mass rape of white women" is a slander, not an argument. Nothing either of us has written defends sexual violence - we’ve defended the principle that citizenship and facts matter, even when emotions run hot.

You keep reaching for the same pattern: start with a real problem (Cologne 2015), exaggerate it into "Muslim culture," and then inflate it into a global Marxist plot. It’s nothing more than a conspiracy theory with a rotating cast of villains - Muslims, Marxists, China, Bezmenov, Kissinger.

If you want to argue for lower immigration, argue for it. If you want to criticise failures of policing, criticise them. But branding critics as rape apologists and spinning Cold War conspiracies doesn’t strengthen your case, it just shows you’ve got nothing left but insults.
Posted by John Daysh, Thursday, 18 September 2025 3:02:36 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
"complicit apologists for the mass rape of white women" is a slander, not an argument.
John Daysh,
I'd say that going by your examples, CM's remarks don't fall into the term of slander. Warranted assumption is what they are & you're arguing them.
I'm suspecting that John Daysh is possibly Paul1405 & I think there's definitely an eastern culture connection. How else can the subtle anti-White sentiments be explained ?
I actually agree with the pointing at White failure however, I also agree with pointing at all other ethnic failures. Just as I agree with acknowledging the positives of all ethnicities.
Posted by Indyvidual, Friday, 19 September 2025 7:31:14 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. ...
  6. 8
  7. 9
  8. 10
  9. Page 11
  10. 12
  11. 13
  12. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy