Indy,

First off it was; "a rumour I heard" that morphed into; " (I) happen to know a resident (non citizen)... That person was allowed to vote." So what is it to be, a rumour, or your boozy old mate down at 'Gods Waiting Room'? Can't have it both ways. Its funny how you always have this "mates" that backs up what you believe to be true.

Indyvidual

OK. I wonder how a non-citizen can get on the voting roll. I know that pretty much anything goes these days in Australia (our voting system is a laughing stock) with no ID necessary.

As I say, I don't know. Apparently crooks can vote several times at different booths, but they still need names (using their own names), but surely there would be the risk (to the crooks) who might use the names of the real people who have already voted?

It's all above my pay grade,

In the meantime, let's leave the gross, crude, unhinged Paul 1405 to his demented ravings.

When I rolled up to vote I was asked "have you voted here before ?" I replied "no, why would I stand in a queue if I voted already". The Woman replied "you'd be surprised how many try to vote more than once".
Isn't there a Law against that ? Are such people called to account ?
As for our resident prize git, I called it a rumour because I can't know if I'm told correctly or not by several. With one person I got it first hand !
Frightening to think the git represents the calibre of Albo's supporters !

Indy,

If I say to you; "All the chooks our out of the pen!", its not a RUMOUR, regardless of whether the chooks are out of the pen or not, its merely a statement by me to you. Just as you claimed; " (I) happen to know a resident (non citizen)... That person was allowed to vote." Now, are you claiming that a 3rd party Old Fart, told you, being the 1st Party Old Fart, that a 2nd Party Old Fart, who we will call Luigi The Unbelievable and non citizen, voted! Surprising what you Old Farts talk about when you get together down at 'Gods Waiting Room. BTW Its time for all you chooks to get back in the pen!

To add even more weight to this fallacy, you now claim, you had a deep and meaningful discussion with the woman down at the polling booth. You claim she said to you; "you'd be surprised how many try to vote more than once". Well the actual question is; Have you voted today?" You could have voted at another polling booth, that's the reason for the question. Answer No, then you give your address, in your case; "Number One Nut House". The Electoral Officer would ask a 1,000 voters the same question that day, why would she bother adding that bit of nonsense information, just for YOU, does she tell everyone that nonsense?

You could have voted at another polling booth,
Paul1405,
Please explain the difference in someone having voted already somewhere to being asked "have you voted here today ? vs "have you voted today ?". The crux of the question is to prevent Leftists from voting more than once at the same election. I suppose in your indoctrination facility this is not discussed hence your silly, utterly unproductive quips !
Thus far, Senator Babett has the clearest assessment yet as to the result of the Australian Society suicide election on May 3rd '25 !

https://youtu.be/NDp37CJsj1g?si=5eTzDyiL_G2vATCb

Indy,

In my electorate, as in yours, there were more than half a dozen polling booths, to ask; "Have YOU voted HERE today ? Is irrelevant, as YOU could have voted at any number of other booths, and still correctly answer NO! I know English is your second language, so try and understand. Make up whatever you like to suit your far right mantra.

As for your SENATOR BIGOT, definably your kinda guy, full of conspiracy, racism, hate etc just like YOU!