Baz,

Socialists can afford to make stuff ups with other people's money; and they don't give a stuff about inconvenience to people.

DD,

Can you reveal this “evidence” you claim exists?

AC,

The U.S has Green Berets stationed 10kms from Communist China: on Taiwanese territory, for the purpose of training Taiwanese troops.

Not a bad idea, given that the Communists regularly make threatening incursions into Taiwanese territory, without Taiwanese permission.

If Taiwan and its islands go, America would be shut out and that really would affect Australia.

Fortunately, America has undertaken to protect Taiwan from the Communists, unlike the Albanese government which is more and more proving to be a sh-thouse ally to America; looking less deserving of American protection every day. Albanese is too busy trying not to offend the Communists, even though they treat him - handsome boy - and Australia with contempt and dangerous stunts against the ADF. Communist China is the enemy, and having any relationship at all with it is gross stupidity.

I hope that the millions of Australians who don't post anti-Australian, anti-American rubbish on OLO are smarter than the few who do, come the next election.

Albanese's lies about have been exposed again by the revelation that he, the defence minister and the foreign minister did NOT remonstrate
with their Communist counterparts. The was a little whine from low-grade public servants about the latest attack on a RAN helicopter.

Hi ttbn,
I think you need to stand back and look at the bigger picture.

We're in a period of a changing world order.
America is desperately trying to cling onto unipolarity but the world has already changed.
The multipolar world order hasn't been born yet, but it's on the way.
There's nothing the West can do to stop it, but it's likely going to try.
You need to think about letting go of what was, and accept the reality of what is and what will be.

The whole world is changing.
Why do you think the West, Europe and Russia are willing to push right to the limits of creating a nuclear conflict?
Because it's the end of US global hegemony, and the beginning of the multi-polar world order.
The West thinks it can force others to cut ties and remain the only game in town, and somehow pull things back to the way it was before, but they're mistaken, just as they have been on everything recently.

"The was a little whine from low-grade public servants about the latest attack on a RAN helicopter."
- I see the statements from the higher-ups more as tantrums.
If it was an actual attack on a helicopter the damn thing would be sitting at the bottom of the Yellow Sea.

Our leaders do have to officially object, but they are doing it in a way that makes them (and us) look pathetic, kind of like a big tough fearless chihuahua.

Ttbn

You’re dead in the water; you have no idea!

Best of luck with a closed mind.

DD

You always turn nasty when you are questioned, or when you can't substantiate your claims and "evidence". I suppose it's to be expected from someone who is proud not to do the only thing most people can do to get change: vote. Poor fool.