Tony Thomas (Quadrant Online), advises that it is said that over 20% of the AHRC are pro-Palestinian. While ideally, people working in human rights should be absolutely neutral, they will have, and are entitled to, personal beliefs.

But, that this knowledge is out, suggests that the AHRC is not to be trusted.

OK. Maybe the 80% might be just the opposite; or they are keeping their views to themselves.

But, we know that, in Australia, under the Albanese regime, the small minority is the tail wagging the dog. And the Opposition is not much better than fleas on the dog.

According to Thomas, this minority “intimidate and insult” their President, Rosalind Croucher “with impunity”. Some turn up for work in keffiyehs

‘The Australian’ says the Commission is not fulfilling its mandate, and wonders why it even exists.

Wet left Coalition time-server Julian Leeser questions why taxpayers are funding a Commission that turns a blind eye to racism.

From the far Left, Senator David Shoebridge criticises the Commission for not doing its job.

The Commission is “frozen by political paralysis” (Leeser) amid a wave of anti-Semitism. It has “gone AWOL”.

President Croucher takes $525,892 off Australian taxpayers, and her seven underlings get from $350k to $416k a pop.

Thomas writes that the “functionality” of the taxpayer-funded employees is “so light” that aboriginal Social Justice Commissioner did it “gratis” for almost six years, after which, a woman did the job for $324k a year.

Further, the AHRC had to be bailed out to the tune of $16 million last year because of over-staffing.

Thomas has a lot more to say in this article. My question is, why do we need this useless financial Burden and others?

It's time to borrow the Argentine President's chainsaw.

https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/qed/2024/03/the-ahrcs-very-own-intifada/

Thanks ttbn for the thread. Kudos.