On 28/12/23 I posted that the United Nations had admitted that UN Women Deputy Chief Sarah Douglas had “committed a violation of the Code of Conduct” in connection with her anti-Israel activity on social media, after UN Watch had raised the breach of conduct.

Douglas endorsed 153 posts since October 7th that promoted anti-Zionism and accused Israel of genocide. As the DC for ‘UN Women’, she failed to condemn Hamas violations of Israeli women. ‘UN Women’ has been silent about Hamas’ atrocities toward innocent civilians, now and in the past.

The UN openly admits that the woman has clearly breached its standards of conduct, and will be “dealt with” in accordance “with U.N Women’s accountability and legal framework”.

But will she? We will never know, because, “Such processes are internal and not made public.”

This wannabe ‘world government’, funded by member states and thinking that it can bully and and eventually control democratic countries - not China and other totalitarian countries - gets away with not revealing how it deals with one of its arrogant thugs; if it in fact actually does deal with her, for her blatant violation of the rules. She should be sacked. She felt guilty enough to delete her comments on X.

UN Watch has screenshots of her violations. The evidence of her admitted violations remains.

Douglas is not some clerk. She is a high ranked, Chief of a department.

Justice must be seen to be done, most would agree. But not this ghastly organisation, the United Nations, sticking its nose into the business of sovereign nations (democratic ones only) - who are paying it to ridicule them.

Since when does the UN work for Israel?
Israel was bombing UN employees.

Do you have any evidence for these rapes ttbn?
Or are they just unsubstantiated allegations?

Screams without proof: questions for NYT about shoddy ‘Hamas mass rape’ report
http://thegrayzone.com/2024/01/10/questions-nyt-hamas-rape-report/

"The Times has come under fire from family members of Gal Abdush, the so-called “girl in the black dress” who features as Exhibit A in Gettleman and company’s attempt to demonstrate a pattern of rape by Hamas on October 7. Not only have Abdush’s sister and brother-in-law each denied that she was raped, the former has accused the Times of manipulating her family into participating by misleading them about their editorial angle."

"The Israeli police have also issued a statement since the publication of the Times’ article asserting that they themselves are unable to locate eyewitnesses of rape on October 7, or to connect the testimonies published by outlets like the Times with anything remotely resembling evidence."

They are nothing but sensational stories meant to dehumanise and give justification for the slaughter of over 24,0000 civilians murdered since October 7, and a further 7000+ missing persons under the rubble

AC

I'm talking about the appalling lack of accountability of the United Nations and its gangsters.

Please read posts before you run amok with your vile hatred.

Not only seen but more importantly felt !

AC, Pregnant Israeli women were cut open and their babies decapitated in front of them as they were dying, others were shot and raped as they also were dying. Hamas is a demonic outfit, and the UN says go easy on them. Israel wants to rid the Universe of this barbaric inhumane hatred. There were no Israeli present witnesses as this happened in homes where everyone was slaughtered, the evidence was discovered.

As I said, this post is about the United Nations and its apparent lack of accountability to the member countries who pay its way. Not Israel or the obvious atrocities committed by Hamas, or other things in that area that people have already made up their minds about.

Hi Josephus,

40 beheaded babies.
- 'The boy who cried wolf.'
(Those lies raised USD$50 million btw)

Israel was caught out selling sensational lies to justify its Oct 7 response.
And somehow it expects others to believe more sensational stories without any evidence?

Why is it we doubt Brittany Higgins story?
- Because there's not enough evidence to prove it.

I'm not saying bad things didn't happen by Palestinians on Oct 7.
But lets face facts here, Hamas game plan wasn't a killing spree, it was a carefully planned military raid on the IDF and they wanted hostages to trade for their own.

There's plently of testimony from Israelis themselves that it was the IDF that killed civilians.

http://twitter.com/ShaykhSulaiman/status/1746275931231318049
Israel was just capitalising on the events of the day with a media narrative that would save itself the embarrassment of what actually happened, and to use the situation as the biggest opportunity its ever had to take more land.

http://twitter.com/Partisangirl/status/1746732870809567501
The IDF admits to being ordered to commit ethnic cleansing. This better be shown at The Hague

Everything the Palestinians are accused of the Israelis are also guilty of:

Israeli Kids Talk About Killing Arabs When They Grow Up
http://youtu.be/ueYUnoB3G2U

ttbn "I'm talking about the appalling lack of accountability of the United Nations and its gangsters."
What is she accountable for if there's no evidence?
What do you want - another person fired at the insistence of the Israel lobby?
To defend the genocidal Israelis?

- And why don't you ever provide a link for context when opening a thread?

My forefathers have been here since the 1810's or earlier and I have a tiny bit of indigenous in me.
Somehow in your world if I don't support Israel I'm un-Australian.
You probably watch too much Sky News.

Twitter may contain some false stories, but the corporate media is the mushroom news.
You'll never even get to hear half the story on any issue, because they don't report any of the real details.

The United Nations faces major challenges.

1) A divided international community.
2) The divisions in the UN Security Council
which must approve its missions.

The Security Council grants each of the Council's 5
permanent members veto power. This provision means
it is exceedingly difficult to prevent powerful states
from using force when it sees fit.

Of course much more needs to be done to end the suffering
in the Middle East. But the UN is part of the solution.
Not part of the problem.

The UN peace keeping operatives have grown dramatically. At the
end of the Cold War in the early 1900s there were 11,000 UN
peace keepers. By 2014 there were 130,000 in 16 far flung
peace keeping operations.

Today 87,000 men and women serve in 12 conflict areas in
Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. We need to acknowledge that
over the past 75 years the UN has sent out more than 2 million
peace keepers to help countries move away from conflict with some
success - that would not have happened if the UN did not exist.

Today it continues to focus on new challenges in the hotspots
where UN peace keeping has operatives including facing
very violent environments, fake news campaigns and a divided
world population. The UN's ultimate goal is restoring
stable governments. It has lost many operatives in trying to
achieve their goals. That should be acknowledged.

It's not a perfect organization - but the world would be a
lesser place without it.

Oh my goodness, this ones an absolute jaw dropper.
http://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/1747401420779999440

If Donald Trump regains the US Presidency the UN, along with other dictatorial rogues in countries such as China and the Islamosphere might need to change their ways. Mr. Trump is no fan of the UN because it doesn't live up to its potential.

Last time he was President, he pulled the US out of the HRC for the joke it was. He accused the UN of causing problems, not solving them. He said that they were a waste of money, and a club for people to get together and have a good time.

Mr. Trump also rejects globalisation, stating that America will be governed by Americans, not the UN

He also takes exception to the UN's “chronic bias” against Israel.

The free world, still (just - under but not because of its current President) led by the United States of America, was much calmer and safer when the likes of Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump were at the wheel.

Australia, never weaker and more divided, thanks to Albanese, should pray for a Trump presidency, even if it is just to see off the shitehawks in the not-so uniting United Nations.

'Twitter may contain some false stories'
- Damn... they got me, the above tweet isn't real, it was satire.

Shame, it felt good seeing someone tell Klaus Schwab and all the elites what many of us are thinking...
- Hopefully some justice will be done with those maniacs.

Looks like Trumps in with a decent chance.
If Democrats argue he was challenging the election when he knew there was no wrongdoing...

- Well there was wrongdoing when the FBI withheld information about the Hunter Biden laptop, studies have shown if the public had known it would've been enough to win closely contested states and the election.

As for charges of sexual assault, NY changed the laws regarding statute of limitations specifically so Trump could be charged.

The charges and witch hunt against Trump going all the way back before 2016 are political in nature, more recently for the purposes of preventing Trump from running in 2024.
I can't see Biden beating Trump in any debate.

I've heard the black vote is apparently leaning towards Trump even though they don't really like him that much.
They know the Democrats haven't had their best interests and they really want to punish them.

"The UN openly admits that the woman has clearly breached its standards of conduct, "

The UN has standards of conduct? Well there's your first mistake!

If I'm understanding David correctly, his argument is that as Palestine is not a legally recognised country, then there cannot be genocide being visited upon the Palestinians.

Therefore, using the same logic, what we know as the Holocaust and the genocide of Jewish people in World War 2 could not be also classified as a 'Holocaust' or 'genocide' as Israel, the 'home' of the Jews was not formally set up until 1948.

Personally I don't think it fair or decent to use such an argument but David is certainly making it for the Palestinians and thus it has to be applied to the unfortunates in the 30s and 40s just to keep the logic clean.

Hi G.O.S
I think you placed your comment on the wrong thread.
Welcome to the forum.

Indonesia, Slovenia back further ICJ proceedings against Israel
http://www.newarab.com/news/indonesia-slovenia-back-more-icj-proceedings-against-israel

Dear Armchair Critic,

Correcting the poodle's diatribe with a few facts suddenly has you apparently running "amok with your vile hatred" and then Proud Boy piles on with more utter garbage. Mate you can't take a trick.