Armchair Critic,

You gave the link on page 17 of the "Peter Dutton - Political
Stirrer," discussion:

http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/oct/01/why-is-labors-bill-on-combating-disinformation-so-controversial

Village idiot,

You are a Gold Star village idiot and outright liar.

The article to which I linked showed that the Nazis at least had some shame when they murdered civilians whereas Hamas and the Greens have none. The Greens are the party with the greatest number of convicted paedophiles, it appears that you have no shame either.

With regards to the failed referendum, this was a colossal cock up, and Albozo now looks like a complete loser. Not a good look one year into a new government.

Foxy,

No one on the left likes Dutton because he humiliated Albozo. Maybe you should read more than only far-left publications. Many people think he is doing a sterling job.

Shadow Minister,

We shall have to agree to disagree on Peter Dutton
and the fact that you think that he's doing a good job.
The people I've spoken to (and there's many) think
that our PM is the one doing a good job.

You should take your own advice and not keep on being
influenced by the Murdoch media. Try to maintain a more
balanced viewpoint.

Peter Dutton has never been interested in the merits or
otherwise of the Voice. He's been merely interested in
how it can be used to damage Labor. Dutton was always going
to oppose any referendum Albanese proposed.

There is nothing that Albanese could have proposed that
would have drawn Coalition support.

There was always a NO campaign ready and waiting in the wings
for anything relating to First Nations people fueled by
mining magnates, wealthy right-wingers and fueled by malignant
people online.

Nevertheless we now get the myth that had Albanese been a
better campaigner, had proposed a different question, or
had delayed the referendum or had been less (or more)
ambitious or somehow done something different the result
would have been different.

High-octave nonsense. The YES campaign is being targeted as
being ineffectual. That a smarter-targeted campaign - had
it been run could have defeated all the vicious forms of
intolerance and misinformation thats fueled the NO
campaign.

Some pretext will always be confected - that's the way the
Coalition works. And that's why they will keep on
losing elections. A change is necessary - starting with its
current leadership.

Bring back Josh Frydenberg!

Foxy,

A little bit of a fib there I see. Dutton originally supported the voice but made it clear that he wanted it limited to parliament only not every level of government and public service. Albozo is the one who rejected any compromise.

As far as vicious misinformation and lies the YES campaign provided more than the No campaign.

Finally, I read widely incl the Guardian, clearly, you don't.

Shadow Minister,

I have no wish to argue with you.

My research is thorough.

Always was, always will be.

Whereas -

Your information lacks a great deal of facts.
Which to me indicates that your research and reading
is narrow and limited. You choose to believe it therefore
any further discussion is pointless.