"The address, a home in Metung, is owned by Business Council of Australia president Tim Reed and his wife, according to The Australian."

I'm curious as to what the connection there was.
That can't be just random or of little consequence.

WTF?

mhaze states: "WTF will act as though it never existed, simply refuse to acknowledge its existence and pretend it never happened."

This is mhaze up to his/her/they adolescent arguing tactics laid bare for all to see - yet again.

As I quoted the co-author the other day: ""Professor Davis also rejected claims that the extra pages were kept "secret" until recently, noting that most have been publicly available for years, as they form part of the 2017 Final Report of the Referendum Council.

"That's the formal report. It's all in there … nothing hidden," she wrote on Wednesday. "It's been there for seven years."

Also from council co-chair Mark Leibler: "I was at Uluru for the national convention and witnessed the adoption of the Statement....It was a one page statement. It should not be confused with records of discussions which were never adopted by delegates at the Convention."

So yes this is how mhaze defines "act as though it never existed, simply refuse to acknowledge its existence and pretend it never happened."

What mhaze says is generally right and to the point. WEF, on the hand, hasn't even addressed the topic, but has run off at the mouth about the bloody Voice, which has nothing to do with the crime of arson.

So typical of Marxist wackjobs!

On second thoughts, the activities of these left-leaning criminals might be a warning of the sort of behaviour we could expect more of if the Voice came into being.

WTF?

ttbn says: " avoid the fact that two people from their ideological camp have been found guilty of arson."

I had earlier posed the question to mhaze: "So is the unstated assumption (going on previous comments in other threads) that if one is supportive of initiatives such as the Voice then one must be supportive of vandalism?"

Clearly ttbn thinks so. This is ttbn thinking not my thinking.

Nobody has denied the fact that two people are guilty.

mhaze and ttbn are implying that those who disagree with them are supporters of those who perform acts of arson.

Quite sad really - hence my comment earlier: What an odd "all or nothing world" some seem to inhabit

WTF

You have identified yourself as being in the same mold as SR, Foxy, and Paul 1405 - to be clearly marked IGNORE. You don't know WTF you are talking about, and just repeat what other idiots and grafters blurt out in Google and Marxist publications.

I respect your right to behave like a nincompoop, but I have no desire to engage with you again.

WTF?

ttbn states: " just repeat what other idiots and grafters blurt out in Google and Marxist publications".

Well if I'm blurting out from Marxist publications then it would be an easy ask for you to identify which quotes I have used from said Marxist publications.

But we both know you cannot.

ttbn you said I was avoiding facts when I clearly was not. You are just plain wrong.

I have explained to you many times that Google is just a search engine.

And as I pointed out in another thread your source "Jo Nova" was disappointed in her Google search so clearly the people you want you quote to back up your point of view have no problem with Google.

ttbn states: "You have identified yourself as being in the same mold as SR, Foxy, and Paul 1405."

So wrong yet again - it is you who is making this identification not me.

Also: " but I have no desire to engage with you again."

They always come back - denialism is a powerful drug.