The Forum > General Discussion > Farnham Gives You're the Voice song to the Voice to Parliament YES Campaign.
Farnham Gives You're the Voice song to the Voice to Parliament YES Campaign.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 36
- 37
- 38
- Page 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- ...
- 86
- 87
- 88
-
- All
Posted by mhaze, Tuesday, 12 September 2023 4:27:50 PM
| |
I firmly believe that the Voice campaign will surge
ahead because of the true nature and sewer tactics used by the NO campaigners. The harder they try - only shows that the YES vote is a threat to them. It won't work. Voters will not be that easily influenced. This has been a long time coming - and giving up is not an option. To many of us - Life is not about waiting for the storm to pass. It's about learning to dance in the rain! Vote YES and come dance with us. Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 12 September 2023 4:58:56 PM
| |
Here is another link for you:
http://smh.com.au/politics/federal/complicit-in-this-lie-labor-demands-dutton-denounce-no-tactics-20230912-p5e3wc.html Posted by Foxy, Tuesday, 12 September 2023 5:02:44 PM
| |
Reparation payments are what those who proposed the Uluru Statement envisaged - They will be made at State level, which is why the Yes campaign under Albanese does not see it attached to the Voice. Land claims and reparations for loss of land is their claim at State level.
Posted by Josephus, Tuesday, 12 September 2023 5:31:59 PM
| |
Nobody from
Labor has contacted me. Which makes a better impression. Foxy, For the sake of the future of this Nation I pray that there are no more than two or three with your mentality in this country ! Posted by Indyvidual, Tuesday, 12 September 2023 6:37:40 PM
| |
The gorgeous Marcia Langton has been caught labelling we NO voters 'racist' or 'stupid'. I don't think that will convert many stupid racists to change their vote. More likely to induce the underdecided to vote NO.
Posted by ttbn, Tuesday, 12 September 2023 7:24:55 PM
|
Somehow Foxy thinks that supplying a never-ending list of highly partisan articles, proves something. Well it does....that she can find a never-ending list of highly partisan articles and somehow never comes across a pro-No article she thinks is worth reading.
Still, this one does provide one piece of useful information....
"The conservatives are correct with one big claim. “We’ve got a prime minister who is deliberately keeping detail from the Australian public until after the vote takes place,” said Dutton on Wednesday. True. Albanese has chosen to campaign on the idea and leave the details for parliament next year. This is a deliberate strategy that defines – and constrains – the debate over the weeks ahead.
Is Albanese being dishonest? No. The details have not been decided ..."
Whenever someone here points out that the details aren't decided and that, therefore, that's a valid reason for voting No, Foxy asserts that all the details are known if only people were as well-read as she. But here's her link setting it out in black and white that Foxy is talking through her well worn hat.
In this thread, Foxy quoted, without understanding , from Orwell's 1984. In that same book, comes the concept of doublethink being the ability, indeed the necessity, of believing two entirely contradictory notions at the same time and thinking they are both right.
You know like the belief that all the details are completely known and the belief that the details haven't yet been decided.
If they had decided and published and set in concrete all the details, there was a chance I'd have voted Yes, depending on the nature of those details. As it is the government wants the people to give them a blank cheque as regards the Voice and it seems the people are declining to do so.
Frankly, it shows how out of touch with the plebs the ALP elite are these days.