impose 'European Settler' responses to Aboriginal issues,
Paul1405,
When European settler beneficial side effects are what the indigenous covet then the indigenous have to eventually come to accept that such benefits come from the European attitude to responsibility. Many Indigenous have not provided anything of their doing & effort. They've been denied access to the land their ancestors frequented but that is an eternity away from contribution. What the indigenous of Australia claim as having been stolen is something they had no input in creating yet what the Australian indigenous desire are the benefits that resulted from European design & toil.
Why is that some Aborigines are in fact more successful in their pursuits of modern European values than many non-indigenous Australians ? I know Aborigines & Islanders who own homes & occupy positions many non-indigenous Australians can only dream of but you don't put them up as role models for "your' people ? Is it because 'your' people are generally like yourself whose only efforts go into bleating victim to a racism that only exists in their indoctrinated mind ?
Aboriginal issues can only be responded to in an Aboriginal sense if non-European based outcomes are desired. European commodities require European thinking & planning !

Dear Paul,

We need to vote YES for Indigenous recognition in our
constitution.

As Australians we pride ourselves on our diverse and
vibrant society. One important piece of our history has
not yet been recognized in our constitution and that is the
65,000 years of continuous cultural connection to this land
by Indigenous Australians, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander people.

By voting YES in the referendum we create a pathway for
Indigenous Australians to speak directly to the government
of of the day about things that work on the ground of their
communities. This will mean fewer misdirected resources
and real results for Indigenous Australians.

The Uluru statement is ultimately about sovereignty, and Lydia is ahead of Labor. According to Legal Affairs Contributor at the Australian Chris Merritt, the Uluru statement may have been “plugged in and imported” from the Republic of Zaire. Core of the Uluru statement is assertion that about sovereignty,
The Labor party has endorsed it, it’s being taught in some schools, but when you look at it … it didn’t come out of Uluru originally.

“It came out of a judgement of the International Court of Justice that was put forward by the representative of the Republic of Zaire.”

Nothing beats the Grand Wizard of the Australian Chapter of the Ku Klux Klan when it comes to racism and way out conspiracy theories. Here he is pushing the absurdity that the 'Uluru Statement from the Heart' has some connection to the African Republic of Zaire! Where does he get this from, none other than a Murdoch Toady, a bloke named Merritt.

I'm can't decide who is the biggest racists on this Forum, there's so many, but this guy works harder than most at getting the prize.

this guy works harder than most at getting the prize.
Paul1405,
No need to worry, that title is yours for life !

Indy,

And you with your racists slurs! Are you still saying I'm a "CONCRETE JUNGLE BUNNY" because I told you I have Aboriginal ancestry? There is no bigger racists than some of the white trash which found its way here after WWII.