I just saw the silliest comment yet from an aboriginal activists - the referendum is 'just asking if aboriginals should be allowed to speak'!

Foxy offered three definitions of what is an aborigine.
As I see it there are a number of white women currently running around
and literally screaming about the voice and other constitutional matters.
They are perfectly entitled to do that, but they are saying it all
as aborigines. Will they be entitled to be appointed to the Voice ?

Will the Voice go on for generation after generation for ever ?
After how many generations will it still be possible to decide who
is an aborigine, or will it be decided by inheritance ?
Looks like we are generating a "Landed Gentry" of our own.
The Voice could look like the House of Lords.

That it is burned into the constitution that is the problem.

If the VOICE is against racism then it'll never let the racists get it off the ground !

One has to be sceptical of several old far right posters on the Forum, who before the last election were promoting a vote for the unashamedly racists political party One Nation. Now the same bigots are claiming a vote for 'The Voice' is a vote for racism. These old blokes would have some credibility if they weren't so blatantly racists themselves.

Bazz refers to "white women currently running around and literally screaming about the voice".

Black, white - the Socialists don't care; all they want are shameless people with big mouths to punt for for the racism of the Voice. Make enough noise in Australia, and you get to choose your colour.

If you can choose your sex, why not your colour!

"white women currently running around and literally screaming about the voice". Would that be Pauline Hanson by any chance, with ttbn waving his anti Aboriginal banner in the background.