I see our the useful idiots are still preaching from the lefty hymn book.

Sorry Foxy, but if you chose to be a useful idiot, & believe what ever you are told to believe, that is what you become.

I have given you nothing but straight evidence that the thing is a fraud, but you chose to ignore it, & the chief idiot becomes abusive as usual.

Time to look through the propaganda & see what the actual data says.

"When you're sick you go to a doctor and heed his/her
advice - unless you're mentally unstable"

If your doctor told you 30 years ago you had 12 yrs to live,and you're still with us, you might seek a new doctor.

If that same doctor told you 20 years ago you had 12 years left and nothing happened,you might seek a new doctor or you might independently check what the doctor said.

If your doctor told you 12 years ago you'd be dead within 12 years if you didn't completely change your ways and,having failed to change your ways but we're just as healthy as ever, you might look askant at your doctor.

But some people are so anxiously gullible that they continue to believe their constantly erroneous doctor. It's almost like they thrive on bad news and are incapable of independent thought.

WTF?
ttbn: States "Well, Ian Plimer still insists that nobody has actually proved that that CO2 is the villain."

I have posted this before but here we go again:

That fact that Plimer's views are not supported by the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the United States Geological Survey, the United States Environmental Protection Agency nor the American Geophysical Union would suggest that his opinions are very much outside of current scientific research.

Plimer is ,however, an outspoken critic of creationism which is a good thing and that would indicate that there is room for his scientific understanding to shift in the future.

WTF?

In 2006, the US Scientist, W.F.J. Evans must have known he would upset the feelings of the delusional alt-right deniers at his presentation to the 18th Conference on Climate Variability and Change.

When presenting his experimental data on greenhouse gases he states:

"This experimental data should effectively end the argument by skeptics that no experimental evidence exists for the connection between greenhouse gas increases in the atmosphere and global warming."

This was 16 years ago.

Experimental data has been available for that period of time but because it hurts the feelings of deniers they choose to ignore it and still claim no data exists.

Hasbeen

The idiots here are about as useful as a cheap Christmas stocking filler that nobody wants. They are not even original: Google and bandicooted bits of doggerel from who knows what other idiots; an Australian Professor is wrong because some unknown Yanks say so - if indeed they did say so: there is no proof (just like there is no proof that CO2 is responsible for anything except nourishing plant.

Ah well. Such is life. Perhaps it's the education system, which is no longer based on the search for wisdom and truth. Education is now dominated by neo-Marxist critical theory, postmodernism, deconstructionism, radical feminism and identity politics - and anything else that will oust rational thought and reason.

It's all about totalitarian control and 'group think'.

Politicians have seen to it that universities and schools are filled with failed communists who, to hide the rapid decline in education standards, now elicit praise for raising ‘responsible global citizens’ (who cannot add, spell, or reason). Not only have political movements capitalised on Millennials, they are pushing to lower the voting age to prop up their regimes.

WTF?
ttbn - I assume you are referring to W.F.J. Evens as your "unknown yank".

W.F.J. Evens has 158 publications available for review on Researchgate - you know the place you go to get the latest reviewed research.

You may not have known about him before but now you do.

Further to his studies, he has empirically shown that the downward radiation flux of greenhouse gases has increased by
over 3.5 Watts/m2 since pre-industrial times.

Deniers are usually very critical of the use of models.

In Evens' case he states " This compares favorably with a modeled prediction of 2.55 Watts/m2"

He showed, therefore, that the models at that time where underestimating the effects of greenhouse gases.