The Forum > Article Comments > Nuclear instability > Comments
Nuclear instability : Comments
By Helen Caldicott, published 14/8/2009Australia seems determined to lead the way to an unstable world whether it is global warming or a nuclear winter.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Page 10
-
- All
You don't see any pro globalisation rallies either, but it still marches on. The commencement of new reactors would tend to contradict this.
"It is noteworthy that in the 1980s, 218 power reactors started up, an average of one every 17 days. These included 47 in USA, 42 in France and 18 in Japan. The average power was 923.5 MWe. So it is not hard to imagine a similar number being commissioned in a decade after about 2015. But with China and India getting up to speed with nuclear energy and a world energy demand double the 1980 level in 2015, a realistic estimate of what is possible might be the equivalent of one 1000 MWe unit worldwide every 5 days"
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf17.html
Similarily, the old plants instead of being expensively decommissioned, are being upgraded with newer and bigger reactors.
The point I was trying to make is that with the call to reduce GHG, smaller countries will not be able to afford renewables and will have either the choice of coal or nuclear. Either the west can allow them to go it themselves and enrich the fuel with the obvious proliferation issues or sell them ready fuel and reprocessing.