The Forum > Article Comments > The depth of corruption > Comments
The depth of corruption : Comments
By John Pilger, published 1/6/2009Something is changing in Britain. The British have never been more politically aware and prepared to clear out decrepit myths.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- Page 2
-
- All
I have heard Pericles say that the Poms don’t have a Constitution. I referred him to two articles dating from 1670, and 1770, which say they do. One was by William Penn, the future governor of Pennsylvania, and the other was Lord Chatham, a Statesman who if listened to may have prevented to colonization of Australia by extending the English Constitution to the future United States.
It was the adoption by the Americans of the Principles of the English Constitution, in their Constitution, that inspired Australians to do the same thing. Sneaky cunning lawyers will always pretend that words have meanings they don’t, and the ultimate corruption both in England and here is the vesting of judicial power in lawyers. From 1297, the English never vested judicial Power in lawyers. To pursue a quasi Soviet Union type of government, the English started vesting power in officers of the State after World War II. These blind and dumb officers, by refusing to abide the English Constitution, and taking absolute power for themselves, let the corruption flow throughout society, just as it did in Soviet Russia. The results will eventually be the same, wherever this corrupt system is allowed to be installed.
It is a blatant corruption granting to themselves, in direct contradiction of all the Constitutions as lawyers, by lawyers in Parliament, of judicial power in Judges. It is a conflict of interest for any lawyer member of Parliament to vote, to vest the Judicial Power of the Commonwealth of the Commonwealth is a Judge. They should all have withdrawn from the Chambers, when S 39 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 was being considered, as they had a vested interest in concentrating power in lawyers. They were banned for 498 years from Parliament in England because it was perceived they had a conflict of interest.
The only remedy is to stick to the Constitution as written