The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The depth of corruption > Comments

The depth of corruption : Comments

By John Pilger, published 1/6/2009

Something is changing in Britain. The British have never been more politically aware and prepared to clear out decrepit myths.

  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All
The Poms and Aussies have the same disease, its called stupidity. When the Poms abolished as of right jury trial, and gave all that power to a Judge, Australian legislators caught the virus.

I have heard Pericles say that the Poms don’t have a Constitution. I referred him to two articles dating from 1670, and 1770, which say they do. One was by William Penn, the future governor of Pennsylvania, and the other was Lord Chatham, a Statesman who if listened to may have prevented to colonization of Australia by extending the English Constitution to the future United States.

It was the adoption by the Americans of the Principles of the English Constitution, in their Constitution, that inspired Australians to do the same thing. Sneaky cunning lawyers will always pretend that words have meanings they don’t, and the ultimate corruption both in England and here is the vesting of judicial power in lawyers. From 1297, the English never vested judicial Power in lawyers. To pursue a quasi Soviet Union type of government, the English started vesting power in officers of the State after World War II. These blind and dumb officers, by refusing to abide the English Constitution, and taking absolute power for themselves, let the corruption flow throughout society, just as it did in Soviet Russia. The results will eventually be the same, wherever this corrupt system is allowed to be installed.

It is a blatant corruption granting to themselves, in direct contradiction of all the Constitutions as lawyers, by lawyers in Parliament, of judicial power in Judges. It is a conflict of interest for any lawyer member of Parliament to vote, to vest the Judicial Power of the Commonwealth of the Commonwealth is a Judge. They should all have withdrawn from the Chambers, when S 39 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 was being considered, as they had a vested interest in concentrating power in lawyers. They were banned for 498 years from Parliament in England because it was perceived they had a conflict of interest.

The only remedy is to stick to the Constitution as written
Posted by Peter the Believer, Monday, 1 June 2009 4:44:01 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
The Australian Constitution was cleverly crafted to keep Australia as a Protestant Christian democracy, and this was done by including the Queen forty times, and requiring all Parliamentarians and Public servants to swear allegiance to Her.

It was not supposed to be able to be avoided by a clever Parliament, but it has and remains in limbo. This is the ultimate in corruption, and the cure for corruption both here and in the United Kingdom is for it to be accepted for what it is. It is an Act of Union with the United Kingdom and Ireland, and is still in force in all three countries, because we have to have a referendum to repeal it, and so far none has succeeded.

The absolute corruption that comes about when the Queen is replaced as head of State by a Parliament and the delegates of the Queen, refuse point blank to accept the responsibilities of allegiance to Her, as all members of Parliament have done, means we have very little hope at all, of ever seeing a return to the rule of law. In order to avoid the consequences of having a Constitution, the States have appointed Judges, and Magistrates as members of an Army of Occupation, which in Australia and England employs an enormous public service. This is no longer accountable back to the people.

The future for the ordinary people in such a world are bleak. The horror world of 1984, that George Orwell wrote about is here with us now. The only hope is for the situation to get so bad that in desperation, the ruling elite is forced to restore the former status quo. A country where corruption from top to bottom remains uncheckable is a country that will see the wealthy get wealthier and the poor get poorer, as we have seen since 1970. If unemployment gets to 10% then there is not enough being produced, to keep the hungry masses fed. We have bought a breathing space. Lets us hope it is not wasted
Posted by Peter the Believer, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 4:26:23 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
A little light relief on the British MP's.
I saw this on another site-it is not my wording,-but it's a good 'un:

"In Tesco's while buying some honey,
An MP came over all funny.
He fell on the floor
and started to roar;
Oh My God! I've just spent my own money!
Posted by Ginx, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 6:28:37 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. 1
  3. Page 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy