The Forum > Article Comments > Goodbye to Mick Keelty > Comments
Goodbye to Mick Keelty : Comments
By Stephen Keim, published 7/5/2009The AFP should be professional, accountable and effective. With Keelty's resignation the government must pursue this objective with vigour.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Page 4
-
- All
Keelty and the AFP were seriously in breach of the rule of law, in their double failure to release to Haneef and his team information that would help Haneef's case.
They repeatedly showed their lack of commitment to democratic principles in their failure to put forward cases for their demands for more police powers until it was too late for those cases to be tested and challenged. An excellent example is the B-Party interception powers.
They, along with the State police services, sought powers supposedly to protect us against terrorism, but saw to it that those powers extended to the investigation of a wide range of crimes, most of them not involving any threat to life. Those powers have been used mainly to investigate the lesser crimes. No justification has been offered for this, except that the powers are useful.
Members of the Bali nine face the death penalty because the AFP alerted the Indonesian police to the nine's activities, instead of arresting the latter in Australia.
When Mick Keelty first came to office, he was notable for his attack on corruption within the AFP. He has built up a strong relationship between the AFP and other police forces in South East Asia. He has been vigorous in an attempt to protect us against the threat of terrorism, which he correctly saw was created or increased by Australia's participation in the Iraq war. Some faults could therefore be excused--if he had been prepared to admit them. Instead, he has become stubborn in the face of evidence and argument. We cannot afford a top police officer who refuses to change his mind. Not can we afford one who has less than a full commitment to democratic values.