The Forum > Article Comments > Violence in our homes - an assault on our future > Comments
Violence in our homes - an assault on our future : Comments
By Todd Harper, published 4/12/2008The full health impacts of violence against women stretch from the family home, to hospitals, prisons and beyond.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- 3
- ...
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Page 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
-
- All
Posted by Antiseptic, Sunday, 28 December 2008 8:13:00 AM
| |
Antiseptic: "Well, you're certainly not very happy being girls..." <-what is the indication of that ?
Antiseptic: "...and you seem sure you know more about what makes a man tick than any of the blokes here." <- what evidence is there of that ? Posted by Pynchme, Sunday, 28 December 2008 10:18:58 AM
| |
Antiseptic apparently confuses women who aren't very happy at being punching bags with those who are "not very happy being girls". As for "what makes a man tick", I'm a bloke and I don't know what miserable men like Antiseptic tick.
A need to overcome some kind of deep inferiority complex, perhaps? Posted by CJ Morgan, Sunday, 28 December 2008 11:04:06 AM
| |
I've been trying to think of a good new years reso.
Then I read this story; "Satish Narayan dies after his wife Rajini allegedly set his genitals alight" http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,24848739-2,00.html Kind of ads a new meaning to Sleeping with the Enemy.(excuse the pun) Posted by JamesH, Monday, 29 December 2008 5:13:54 AM
| |
Pynchme:"what is the indication of that ?"
The constant stream of "woe is me" from you and the sideline squatters is a pretty good starter. If you're really happy being a grrrl, why do we never hear anything positive from you about it? From the stuff you've published, women are nothing more than hapless victims of fate, entirely unable to do anything to help or take responsibility for themselves, while men are always in charge and in full control of all their faculties and their destiny. I know which of the genders I'd rather be in your dismal world and was paying you the compliment of assuming you to be equally rational. Silly of me, really. Pynchme:"what evidence is there of that ?" Actually, there's no evidence you know anything at all about what makes a bloke tick, but that doesn't stop you trying to tell those of us who do how to behave. On second thoughts, you're far better being a grrl - all the responsibility of being a bloke would be too much for you. CJ Morgan:"apparently confuses women who aren't very happy at being punching bags with those who are "not very happy being girls"." Oh dear. I do think you made the right decision in not procreating, I really do. The gene pool is already shallow enough. Posted by Antiseptic, Monday, 29 December 2008 8:34:18 AM
| |
Antiseptic: << I do think you made the right decision in not procreating, I really do >>
Antiseptic displays his usual perspicacity. Actually, I have three beautiful children and one delightful grandchild. I've even been married and divorced a couple of times, but I remain close friends with my ex-wives. Somehow I've managed to do all that without becoming bitter, miserable and twisted like the male losers who inevitably dominate these discussions at OLO. Posted by CJ Morgan, Monday, 29 December 2008 8:51:30 AM
|
Well, you're certainly not very happy being girls and you seem sure you know more about what makes a man tick than any of the blokes here. It was the only logical conclusion.