The Forum > Article Comments > The missing Obama landslide > Comments
The missing Obama landslide : Comments
By Ben-Peter Terpstra, published 20/11/2008Barack Obama's election was symbolic, certainly, but an election landslide it wasn't.
- Pages:
-
- 1
- 2
- Page 3
- 4
-
- All
Accusing Obama of cronyism, is an irrational judgement,
at this point in time.
A judgement should not be made until all
appointees have been announced.
So far it appears that the best qualified people are
being considered based on knowledge, experience,
and proven ability to do the job, (no matter what their
political affiliation). Not all of the appointments have
been made - there's still 8 weeks to go.
Being gracious in defeat - is a given, in politics.
Even John Howard rose to the occasion.
Therefore it hardly comes as a surprise that John McCain
was gracious in defeat, acknowledging the significance
of his rival's victory.
At the same time, let's not forget Barack Obama was equally
gracious, in acknowledging John McCain in his acceptance
speech. And, it was Obama who initiated a meeting with
McCain after the election where both men agreed to work
together in the interests of the nation.
The fact that John McCain didn't get it - is the reason
he lost the election. The mistakes that were made were:
1) He did not recognise the widespread voter frustration
with his Republican Party. He also made the following
errors in judgement:
2) Blunders on the economy.
3) Not distancing himself enough from Bush.
4) Choice of his running mate.
5) His attacks on his opponent.
6) Support for the war in Iraq.
Political analyst Allan J. Lichtman sums it up in the
following way:
"This election, above all, was a complete
repudiation of the Bush Presidency.
American elections are basically
votes up or down
on the performance of the party holding
the White House and basically Americans
said loud and clear they don't like
the way the country has been governed
over the last years..."