Dickie,

Perhaps we should just wrap him up and post him, save our dollars to then buy some celebratory beers!

"Perhaps we should just wrap him up and post him,"

Good thinking Rainier but according to the Centre for the Biological Control of Parasites and Pathogens, Customs will seize any toxic compound dispatched by post to the UK.

Mind you Rainier, they may find his hairy palms intriguing.

Col

I kindly suggest you ease off the Viagra - your brain is being starved of oxygen.

I was replying to HRS in my last post. He has always denigrated women who want to participate in the workplace equally to men. Sarah Palin clearly believes that she has the same rights as any man to choose a career over full-time motherhood.

Maybe you have missed all the posts where HRS has promoted motherhood and marriage over careers for women.

In case you have never had the intellect to decipher my thoughts on feminism, I will explain them clearly for you now:

I believe men and women have the right and should have the choice whether to follow careers and participate in parenting or a combination of both. How this is decided is up to the men and women concerned.

I do not believe that biology is destiny. I do not believe that women or men should be forced to be parents against their will.

But HRS does believe women should be the primary care givers to young children, yet he professes to find Palin an exemplary example of womanhood. An irony I find very amusing.

As for you objecting my right to criticise Palin, I HAVE EVERY RIGHT and so do you.

Suggest some Gingko Baloba - good for the brain.

Capiche?

Fractelle,
I’ve never said the mother should be the primary carer. You probably have your feminist brainwashing and feminist propaganda mixed up with reality.

The author would make a fine representative of a feminist.

“Palin may be a woman, but to many feminists and other Clinton supporters she does not speak for women.”

She didn’t say “Palin may be a woman, but to many feminists and other Clinton supporters she does not speak for women or men”.

Perhaps the author is too bigoted, biased, prejudiced, sexist, discriminatory and feminist to think along those lines.

Next feminists will be saying they believe in equality.

Cuphandle, why don't you find a life instead of giving an impression of a jet aircraft landing (big whine)

Fractelle “I was replying to HRS in my last post.”

You post, I respond to posts, I do respond specifically because you do or do not expect a response and nor do I care that my posting seems to offend you.

If you are that sensitive, do us all and yourself a favour and don’t bother to post in future.

“In case you have never had the intellect to decipher my thoughts on feminism”

I have the intellect but not the inclination.

So don’t bother.

“As for you objecting my right to criticise Palin, I HAVE EVERY RIGHT and so do you.”

I made no objection to you posting your view of Mrs Palin, lets face it your views are so marginal as to not matter, so 'objecting' to it would be a wasted effort.

I did find the reference source that your 'creatively' cut-and-pasted your post from of terribly low quality, dubious veracity and observed the degradation which can be acquired from referencing a useless source parallels laying down with dogs and acquiring fleas..

So when you use web references make sure you don't gain someone elses words at the price of whatever might be left of your credibility.

But I believe in freedom of speech anyway… so as we can now read, through freedom of speech, you exercise your right and demonstrate the inadequacies of your view.

I see rainier and dickie are trying to present an image of a comedy duo,

Someone should tell them, they collectively don't measure up to half a solo act.

ColRouge:

Why can`t you get it through your thick head that nobody wants to listen to your continuous droning-on, over and over, saying the same old thing that is simply a very boring repetition of your original very one-eyed statement!

You are a very frustrated, self-centered egotist, exhibiting a need for either some form of peer group attention, or, and I am more inclined to think, the urgent attention of the services of a psychotherapist.

Whichever way it seems that you are just some sort of sad sack of crap that enjoys putting down everyone else except yourself!

With the psychological problems that you appear to exhibit, ....your ex-wife should only be too pleased to be rid of you!