The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > Degrees of dishonour > Comments

Degrees of dishonour : Comments

By Jonathan J. Ariel, published 6/3/2008

Honorary degrees must be revoked when the recipient does something to impact negatively on the awarding university's reputation.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All
I completely disagree with the basic argument.

There is no fate more fitting for any system of public honours than that its recipients should turn out rogues and charlatans.

This is particularly true for honorary doctorates, which are a sham and a mockery more often than not. But it is not exclusive to that domain.

Think of all the greedy, violent, sycophantic, and vainglorious try-hards who have won (and kept) Australia Day honours over the years. Or who have had streets or buildings named after them.

Funny enough, Melbourne University is particularly redolent with examples: think of Grattan Street, or the Alan Gilbert Building.

Anybody who takes these honours too seriously is begging for disappointment.
Posted by Tom Clark, Thursday, 6 March 2008 10:08:06 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
One could ask how honorary doctorates are given in the first place.

There was one recipient of a honorary doctorate from an Australian university who refused to speak to the press afterwards. However the honorary doctorate was taxpayer funded, and a refusal to speak to the press was basically a refusal to acknowledge the public who had funded the doctorate.

That recipient was mainly based in the UK, and once stated that women who read a certain UK newspaper were “n_____s at the bottom of the woodpile”.

She also stated that Princess Dianne was a “devious moron” 10 years after she had died and had no way of defending herself.

She described the recently deceased Peter Brook as a “hoon” and the recently deceased Steve Irwin as “a self-deluded animal tormentor”.

She also called for Tony Blair to stop having sex with his wife, and said that their relationship was "a very weird relationship".

She has urged mother to “go on strike” for better childcare, after saying that teenage mothers were better mothers because its “easier to get down on the floor with kids if you are a kid yourself,"

She released a book that many regard as pedophilic, and refused to remove the photograph of a male off the cover of that book after he had requested that he do so, and had never given permission for the photograph to be used.

She has also stated that she prefers young males to older men, but such a statement by a male professor would obviously bring instant dismissal.

She has also written that men are “surplus to requirement”, and one has to question how an Australian university awards an honorary doctorate to someone who has written that 50% of people in the world are surplus to requirements.

Would that university ask for the honorary doctorate to be returned?

Probably not, but it certainly doesn’t say much for the standards of Australian universities.
Posted by HRS, Thursday, 6 March 2008 10:19:12 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
I think Jonathon Ariel goes over the top first in attributing too much significance to honorary degrees and secondly in accusing the University of Melbourne of grovelling in "star struck adoration" of its Dr Pratt.

Let's not mince words: Pratt got his Honorary Doctor of Laws for his hefty financial contributions to the University. Everyone knows how the game works and we all know examples where lots of money gets results. Hardly "adoration".

Others get honorary degrees in recognition of their having made significant contributions to knowledge. Some of these hold no formal qualifications but nevertheless make a major contribution to an area of learning. A third group are honoured for their renowned achievements in a variety of fields, not necessarily academic. Universities are fond of claiming a share of the achievements of these last two groups.

Most of us know the difference between the three classes of awards and are hardly in danger of confusing them.

As to the possible damage to a university's reputation when the awardee's reputation takes a nose-dive after the event, I suppose that depends on at least four things:
(a) the nature of the misdemeanors committed by the holder of an honorary degree;
(b) whether anyone gives a fig about the holding of honorary degrees anyway;
(c) whether the honorary degree holder can gain any undue advantage from holding a piece of paper that they may or may not have deserved in the first place ; and
(c) whether the university's reputation is so fragile that it is damaged by the blotted copybook of one of its honorary 'doctors'.

I would have thought that the University of Melbourne - opened in 1854 - relies on many more significant achievements than Dr Pratt's dodgy business dealings.

Next topic please Jonathon.
Posted by FrankGol, Thursday, 6 March 2008 12:26:06 PM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Frank Gol,
I think people should be giving a fig, as Australian universities have become the worst aspect of Australia’s education system.

Up to about grade 10 Australian students are doing quite well by international standards, but after that the rot sets in, and Australia has only 1 university in the top 100 universities in the world. I would attribute this to the minimal standards in our universities.

I would agree in one respect. If someone gives money to a university or vilifies males and calls themselves a feminist then the university will give them whatever award they want.
Posted by HRS, Friday, 7 March 2008 6:57:42 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Honorary Degrees are one of the most needless awards. What is the point ? either someone does the study to obtain a degree or he/she doesn't get a degree.
a very pointless exercise which encourages what ?
If someone does something extraordinary outside their field of expertise or line of work then they should get a plaque of appreciation but an honorary degree ? Nope !
Posted by individual, Friday, 7 March 2008 7:10:24 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
HRS claims: "Australia has only 1 university in the top 100 universities in the world. I would attribute this to the minimal standards in our universities."

He provides no evidence for that jaundiced opinion.

By contrast, the Times Higher Education Supplement University Rankings, THES-QS Top World 200 Ranking for 2007 show the following world ranking scores for the top 10 Australian universities:

Aust Rank World Rank
ANU 1st 16th
Uni of Melbourne 2nd 27th
Uni of Sydney 3rd 31st
UQ 4th 33rd
Monash 5th 43rd
UNSW 6th 44th
Uni of Adelaide 7th 62nd
UWA 8th 64th
Macquarie 9th 168th
QUT 10th 195th

Eight of our top 10 in the world's top 100. Doesn't sound like "minimal standards" to me.

(Source: http://www.australian-universities.com/rankings/)

On student assessment of quality, Australian Education International’s 2006 International Student Survey found Australia was the country of first preference for 84% of overseas students studying at Australian universities. And the survey found that they rated quality of education, reputation and future employment prospects as the main reasons for choosing to study at an Australian university. They didn't just come because they could get a place.

85% of survey respondents were either very satisfied or satisfied with the overall study experience in Australia, and 83% were very satisfied or satisfied with their university course.

(Source: http://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/content.asp?page=/news/media_releases/2007/avcc_media_21_07.htm)

Doesn't sound like "minimal standards" to me
Posted by FrankGol, Friday, 7 March 2008 9:29:46 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy