The National Forum   Donate   Your Account   On Line Opinion   Forum   Blogs   Polling   About   
The Forum - On Line Opinion's article discussion area



Syndicate
RSS/XML


RSS 2.0

Main Articles General

Sign In      Register

The Forum > Article Comments > The new Silk Road: rail links from China > Comments

The new Silk Road: rail links from China : Comments

By David DuByne, published 2/11/2007

As energy jitters rattle the global economy, the New Silk Road of locomotives will allow a realignment of trade in Eurasia.

  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All
All good stuff, but for the assumption that shipping will be disadvantaged in an energy constrained world. Shipping will increase as the cost of fuel goes up because the the underlying physics, and the cost, volume, profit relationships are superior to that of rail. The ocean "sea roads" are all in place and need no maintenance.
Posted by Perseus, Friday, 2 November 2007 10:23:51 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
yes, per, sea travel always cheaper than rail. plus, there is a good case for sail powered sea transport, supplemented by solar cell auxiliary power. that's very cheap, and green as well.

but pipelines from china to kazahkstan and iraq will transport gas and oil even cheaper, and are more reliable. for awhile, the industrial and commercial center of the world will be asia.

but fossil fuels will be gone soon enough and renewables are everywhere. national education standards are the only constantly reliable asset.
Posted by DEMOS, Friday, 2 November 2007 12:22:11 PM
Find out more about this user Visit this user's webpage Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Water borne transport is the most energy efficient of all.
In addition in the last resort the modern sailing clippers now
being designed can can take over from all fossil fuels driven ships.
Posted by Bazz, Monday, 5 November 2007 10:45:44 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
But nobody says anything about the tech advanced nuke powered ships?
Who will be the first?{cargo ships}
Can Aussie deny port access? What will NZ do?
May be not coal trains accross asia but nuke ones.
fluff4
Posted by fluff4, Monday, 5 November 2007 11:10:07 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
Hmmm, yes fluff4, I certainly did not think about nuclear powered ships.
Long term peak uranium is only about 40 years away and shipping may not
be able to compete for fuel against electricity generation.
Also shipping may not get a ration as they can use the wind.
Posted by Bazz, Monday, 5 November 2007 11:37:46 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
While recognising the advantages of wind power BAZ, ie new tech, I could if pressed remind you of lots of disadvantage in wind power.
It's slower for one, the modern economy of last minute ordering and holding little stock is established, it can of course be moderated.
Forty years for nuke? have you ref? I need to read more.
thanks fluff4
Posted by fluff4, Tuesday, 6 November 2007 9:24:49 AM
Find out more about this user Recommend this comment for deletion Return to top of page Return to Forum Main Page Copy comment URL to clipboard
  1. Pages:
  2. Page 1
  3. 2
  4. All

About Us :: Search :: Discuss :: Feedback :: Legals :: Privacy